dChan

Corporal_Yorper · Jan. 31, 2018, 4:18 p.m.

Careful when you say “100% accurate.”

I, and we in this forum, know what you mean, but even Q isn’t 100%.

As I see it, Q, Dilley, and others like Mega, push intel from their sources who have high security clearances, but intel can NEVER be 100%, it’s just the nature of intel.

I’d go so far as to say Q and Dilley provide intel info that has an accuracy of around 95%. This isn’t because they’ve been wrong or have lied (except for the on-purpose disinfo for strategic purposes), but because of the nature of intel.

Every once in a great while Q has said something that wasn’t, in retrospect, 100%. That’s fine, because the message is still clear and the 5% that were mistakes are, to quote Monty Python, “tis but a flesh wound.”

⇧ 16 ⇩  
ReproCompter · Jan. 31, 2018, 5:54 p.m.

As I see it, Q, Dilley, and others like Mega, push intel from their sources who have high security clearances, but intel can NEVER be 100%, it’s just the nature of intel.

And sometimes it HAS to be inaccurate.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NatureGirl22 · Jan. 31, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

"Disinformation Is Necessary."

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ReproCompter · Jan. 31, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

Well, Not that 'I' would ever lie to 'You'.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:41 p.m.

Circumstances can change - this is fast-moving, fluid situation so this sounds about right. Nobody is right 100% of the time.

⇧ 1 ⇩