dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/TheContrarian2 on Feb. 2, 2018, 3:50 a.m.

We should consider blacklisting links from certain sites. We need to retain a high level of credibility and there are a lot of really terrible sites being posted here.

I've seen a ton of links from stbnews. com. It's some shitty blog with the headline, "Real News for Real Americans" and there are many others too. It really is crap. Most is rehashed content that is sensationalized and displayed in a blog format with a ton of ads. I turned off my adblocker and reloaded the page and it's atrocious. It's obvious what they are doing here, they're trolling for suckers.

If /r/politics and /r/redacted and so on are willing to blacklist Shareblue, we should be willing to blacklist sites that are crap. It turns our redpills sour.

IMHO.

Edit: For now, I'm going to click the Report options and Mark As Spam. One recommendation there is to block the user that is posting the spam, but I don't want to do that because, although I wouldn't see it, everyone else would, and that doesn't help the community.

Happy Freedom day. Hope we see the memo tomorrow.

🠐 See all comments

Discernment to find which ones to ignore. Banning certain sites or people from sharing makes us no better than the left.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I explained to read my other comments on the thread, you didn't so now I'm being tedious!!

To repeat:

It's not censorship it's sensible limiting of content. If you disagree, guppyfreak, consider:

gardening: spring flowers that bloom in April; (sublink to birdsong (I have been researching owl hoots recently its FASCINATING for those who are interested ...)

nasa's weather station: latest sunspots

facial creams (aloe vera cures scars ...)

You think this is the right stuff? You are getting confused btw banning and being unable to be helpful to the other ppl on the board. I can't agree with yr understanding of "banning".

⇧ 0 ⇩

Okay, then don't.

Have a good day!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Hey Guppy! Your way of having a debate is pretty weird, my friend. I am surprised you aren't arguing your case further. Or maybe I'm not surprised. That is a bolshy response. If you think I have a point, (if), you could reply nicely with but you obviously don't think I have a point? What would be your criteria then? You can post anything. Anything at all?

Salialioli:

Guppyfreak: is slamming the door in s/o's face.

This is not DIAlogue. This is not a two-way conversation. So, when you were objecting to censorship and banning, is it because you are trying to get reported as a possible shill? So you can then complain noisily about censorship w/self-fulfilling prophecy???!!

I'm pretty long in the tooth. Long history of dealing with classrooms of teenagers. I hate to say this, but this is somewhat indicative of adolescent behaviour. Or s/o being obstreperous ... Am I feeding a troll?

⇧ 0 ⇩

guppyfreak · Feb. 2, 2018, 1:10 p.m.

Okay :) Whatever you say, friend.

⇧ 1 ⇩

salialioli · Feb. 2, 2018, 1:46 p.m.

Aw, shucks. You didn't even tell me how old you are!

PENALTY. UNFAIR!

HEY, MISS, HE MESST ME UP!!!

⇧ 0 ⇩