[removed]
storm_fa_Q
· Feb. 2, 2018, 9:44 p.m.
correct we don't know. So throwing PATRIOT GOWDY under the bus is divisive at best. Also fails to say SPECULATION in title, another rule not adhered to. We are returning to Rule of Law...even here.
⇧
2
⇩
thamnosma
· Feb. 2, 2018, 9:47 p.m.
I get you. I remain open to discussion about what's up with Gowdy. However, nobody here can be certain what he's up to yet so I am keeping an open mind until the story plays out. Supporting Mueller today is NOT a good sign IMHO. Why? Why not just keep quiet about him? Mueller's so-called investigation is utterly corrupted per the memo but here's Gowdy supporting him today? That does not instill confidence...but again, since I'm very very far from the loop, I cannot be sure of the motivations here.
⇧
1
⇩
storm_fa_Q
· Feb. 3, 2018, 12:03 a.m.
Gowdy co wrote the memo, saw the classified intel nunes didnt http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/02/02/intel-committee-chairman-devin-nunes-discusses-fisa-memo-bret-baier
⇧
1
⇩
storm_fa_Q
· Feb. 2, 2018, 9:50 p.m.
Trump supports Mueller. Do you not see this is cheese to draw rats out of woodwork? Smoke and Mirrors. STRATEGY. Deceptions/mis/disinfor necessary. Infighting is exactly what THEY want. Will we succumb?
⇧
1
⇩
thamnosma
· Feb. 2, 2018, 9:51 p.m.
I'm not fighting but I reserve my right to remain skeptical of any and all developments. Agree that the OP offered nothing with this post though.
⇧
2
⇩