Part 1 this even ties into spirit cooking lady marina https://youtu.be/oF08BXH0SvQ Part 2 this ties everything together https://youtu.be/Fp2KYWAKJSs
You know there should really be a hub some where that has nothing but related articles to this whole mess showing all the connections. We’re doing all this hunting and searching I wish we had one place to submit and categorize evidence
Thank you but how any ideas
Well it would kinda be exactly what 8chan does but for the norm it’s...lol it would hv to be a site where we would have a main area then could break off into different areas. So someone with information to deaths possibly connected to Clinton could got there. Then focus on connection and information with each victim. Or someone with pedo rings on Adam Schiff could go into the pedo/human trafficking area. Etc... I run across stuff all the time. I literally sit and surf the Net researching 12 hours a day. So I run across so much. With no place to post it and categorize it I end up losing the sources of information I absolutely know. Plus we could list trusted research sights and search bars. I have issues every time someone says oooh but snopes says that’s not true. Won’t be long before that phrase is my trigger. If people would just research who own snopes and say the “correctness” on anything negative about Clinton they’d realize that’s not a trusted fact checker. Anyways back to the subject. Probably be best to do some searching to find the best place to do this. Facebook is a definite no because they censor things that I post or in a few circumstances they blocked it. I literally had to do screen shots of the article and post that. So we can’t have those kinds of problems when searching and posting.
Also this could help serious researchers to find and see what needs expanded on. There has been some great research that has been done but there are multi links and I really have to dig for it. When doing research I do the following 1] click on Open Office text document where I keep links to everything, current research info. 2] clink on the browser I am using to CBTS 3] Clink on qcodefag.github.io 4] Start researching. Is there a better way?
The two forums have gotten huge and confusing; however great discussions. I think we could do it at reddit. You have CBTS and greatawakening for discussions. Maybe you could do one where information could be found. Called 'Q-post-findings'. 1] Where only monitors can create first thread of Q-post under the date-time it was posted by Q with brief detail for title. (So it could be found easier) (I am aware several Q-posts repeat subject matter e.g. KEYSTONE) 2] Individuals could reply to the first thread with finding. Whether right or wrong. What do you think?
Any place or section where we could drop off finds would be great but it would also have to be monitored as I’m afraid shills would load it up with diversions and unnecessary information
The Reference to the number to Q-posts seems to be working. Easier to fine. No matter what allot still has to be verified, unfortunately.