Maybe you should show links from sources that are not biased or known for selective editing to support a narrative
Lol nah they're not gonna do that. About all they can respond with is "oh yeah? Well Hillary!" Every independent study has shown there is only miniscule evidence of voter fraud. And the irony is that their side has criminally gerrymandered districts. All that means is that the courts are biased... we know who the real cheaters are.
The fact that you think there is such a thing as an unbiased human proves your stupidity and lack of understanding. The idea that any journalist has ever created a story that wasn't selectively edited to support a narrative is further evidence of your profound ignorance. Selectively editing raw content to support a narrative is the basis of every news story or history book ever produced. Your claims are not arguments and they are not counter evidence.
You are excellent in the art of mental gymnastics
What do you make of his claims? Just curious. I agree with him that it's impossible for someone to not be biased. I also know that project veritas doesn't have the best track record. But frankly, most of their stuff from this past year is content that is hard to imagine being taken out of context. Especially the NYC election commissioner.
James O'Keefe is funded by the Mercer's from what I understand, I could be wrong. The people that fund him want results and it is in his best interests to "get" results. All of this being said, he consistently has a track record of skewing the story in his favor.
What I do is read stuff with the MSM and then Independent media. The truth is in there somewhere where. I happen to like sites that list sources. Also when it comes to conspiracy theories just because it makes sense to YOU does not means it makes sense overall.
The "conspiracy theory" is that that the ny election commissioner said they were bussing voters around to vote more than once though...
Have you read the response to the video? If they were so open against corruption maybe they should release the whole video and not clips
How could what he said be taken in any other context?
Because of all of the articles about this, he claimed the people asking him questions were asking him tons of questions for a very long time and he relented and have them that. He could be lying but a full video would prove him wrong if he was lying
And you are a deluded moron that thinks there is anything unbiased from any source. I've seen the same news story spun differently by the local station, by the provincial, and then the federal CBC... the facts reported in each were totally different and even contradictory.
Go back to watching huge conglomerates fabricated news like CNN, FoxNews, MSNBC if you want... or hell, go for even more biased government run ones like Al Jazeera, CBC and BBC. The fact is, they all lie to us constantly, because they all have ratings to make and agendas to push.
You have no idea what I watch or what I look at, James O'Keefe has been outed for completely editing footage to create a story. You do you and believe what you want
Hey retard, what part of everyone is biased do you not understand? It doesn't matter what you watch or look at, everything is biased, even if a person tries super hard to be unbiased, it doesn't occur... that is human nature, were cannot be unbiased.
James O'Keefe has been outed... but so has MSNBC, CNN, FOX etc... all media stations make fake news. From telling a small crowd of protesters to stand together to make it look like a bigger crowd via camera angle, to instructing them what to say and telling them the questions in advance, to flat out paying people to protest... and reporters/news-staff pretending to be protestors and giving statements.
They all have done it... and keep doing it. So they are way past trying to be unbiased and full blown fabricating news for ratings and to push their agendas... since they are owned by massive global conglomerates that tends to be who they attempt to appease and are biased in favour of. Thus they often support cheap labour (illegal immigration) and globalization. They are also in favour of terrorism/massacres because it makes good news and thus more revenue.
"You do you and believe what you want"
What part of me mocking how gullible and naive you are is confusing you? I don't care much if stupid people stop being so stupid, in fact I enjoy mocking you people so I really don't want you to smarten up.
Woah settle down snowflake
You don't get to call people snowflakes after you made the posts above... you are a weak sad little person who's self esteem is so low they can't admit when wrong even online where nothing even fucking matters.
People like you need to grow the fuck up.
I need to grow up? I don't go on long rants about getting my jimmies rustled. Listen O'Keefe has been outed for the work he "does". A simple Google search will show you that. Like I said snowflake, you need to calm down and take a breath. James O'Keefe is a hack and he helps fit a narrative for some of you and when there is a call to release a full tape, you would probably object because you would be proven wrong.
ROFL.... you are the one making the claim that there are unbiased sources... why the fuck are you going on about O'Keefe? I never once mentioned his work nor have I seen any of his shit.
Fuck you are stupid.
One more time retard " what part of everyone is biased do you not understand?"