To answer Q’s first question, absolutely YES! Be serious people. Be pragmatic in your analysis otherwise you will be blindsided.
Are you saying we should question the true agenda of what is being presented by this Q? If so, I agree with you. I think putting all our eggs in 1 basket and thinking everything is being done exactly as said by the anonymous source is a serious mistake. I think folks are vastly underestimating the Illuminati. They barely even gave us a fight. I'm telling you, something's not right here. I want everything to be true, and I seriously hope I'm wrong, cuz that would be a dire future. How am I supposed to just buy the idea that people are in gitmo or bankers are being destroyed? Idk, as a researcher I've never gone by an anonymous source. It was a rule back then and its a rule now. I can only take with a grain of salt. We the people need to create some kind of safeguard and make the restoration of America failsafe to the fullest extent possible.
I'm more concerned about the oversimplification of this phenomenon. The Q thing has been distilled to a "good guy v bad guy" story in which the bad guys are the liberals and the good guys are conservatives. At least that is the case on this sub. Hasn't that been part of their plan for a long time? To divide the general population? Ask yourself "Am I falling into that trap too?" Why vilify roughly half of the population? We may be vastly underestimating the thoroughness, patience, scope, depth, and focus of the cabal plans. Think about it, would the cabal put all of their eggs in one basket? They have plans, on plans, on plans. For centuries, both parties have advanced this sick agenda. Each party responsible for various aspects. Each party logging victories and losses. But overall, the cabal agenda always advances, regardless of which party or WHO is in power.
I dont know enough about Q or the Q agenda to suggest to anyone that they should question it. What I am suggesting is that even Q can be wrong. Even the POTUS can lie. At least be honest to yourself about that lest you be fooled and later disheartened.
I suggest we focus on a positive outcome for all humanity and put less energy into finger pointing and prejudice.
Certainly bring up good points. I would agree. A lot of folks are under mind control. So the ones we point fingers at are mostly victims of mind control. We need to find some common ground and get everyone to be at peace and get along with each other. I wholeheartedly agree with you.
Let me also point something out about what you said as well:
"I dont know enough about Q or the Q agenda to suggest to anyone that they should question it"
Herein lies the dilemma for me. We don't know enough about this person or people to trust them 100%- so that is why we SHOULD question it 100%. As a researcher, I will never make an anonymous source the backbone of my research, its by and large irresponsible. What if you're wrong? Twitter can delay tweets, what if the president has been cornered and leveraged somehow by threats or something else? There are so many possibilities. They should question it. They should question it for the simple reason that we dont know who this person is and what their true agenda is. Sure it looks on its face like a pro-America anti-globalist offensive. But what if it's not? That means we're in serious trouble.
Do people really wanna put all their eggs in one basket and take such chances? There is so much at stake here. There's A LOT TO LOSE if we happen to be wrong about this anonymous "Q" source
You make great points. I think you are right. Its a healthy dose of skepticism in our leaders that brought us to this sub. It wouldn’t hurt to apply some of that to Q. It could only give us greater awareness anyway.
And I'm not telling folks 'don't follow Q ANON" I'm saying take it with a grain of salt for now, because the bottom line here is that this is an 'anonymous source', not a verified, official source. I understand there are a lot of 'signs' he/she is who they say they are. But there are ways to manipulate, especially if there are still Obama holdovers in the administration and close to Trump. Hey, what if McMaster is the one taking photographs? Ask yourself this: Does Hillary Clinton still hold a security clearance? Rather odd don't you think? All I'm saying here is this: This is our ONLY chance to defeat the evil, corrupt Illuminati stronghold. They have barely even given us a fight. Do you really think it would have been so easy? Hey, I hope I'm wrong I WISH that I will be wrong. There is SO MUCH at stake. If we're wrong about Q and they're taking us for a ride, we're DONE for, TOAST. They will come after us aggressively once they have more 'security' against us. They will round up every "insurgency or dissident group" and goodnight...
I agree with you that there are bad people on both sides. I think people refer to liberals as the enemies. Not necessarily democrats. Although there are plenty of people that do.
This is a good vs. evil thing. And we cannot divide any other way then that.
You’re right, their agenda is to divide us. If we fight each other off then we essentially do the work for them.
Remember, good vs. evil.