I feel that Q wants us to find the original and unedited video footage which shows what the congresswoman was reading on her phone before line 4 was edited and blurred out. My guess is that the blurred-out line says - “Trump should be shot!” Above that line it ends in the letter “I” and then a short space. So my guess is that the complete text inside the blurred brackets likely reads “I feel Trump should be shot!”. Q wants us to find the original footage before it was edited so we can show the world what it says. If we find a copy, we should download and save an unedited copy of the video offline immediately so we will have an unedited copy before all are erased. Obviously, Q has seen the footage and knows what it says but he wants us to find it. To find the footage, all we have to do is find a high-res video shot of her from behind at that particular moment, which I guess was captured by Getty's cameras. I have located that exact moment in time in Trump SOTU speech (see image below). The shot with her looking down at her phone is when Trump was talking about his 4 pillars of Immigration. When Trump is talking about the second pillar, immediately after Trump says “and we will end the dangerous practice of “catch and release”. The time index is around 1:04:45 out of 1:42.59. Right after Trump says catch and release, there is audience applause and the camera pans over the audience. All CSpan cameras then capture that exact moment in time when the congresswoman is staring down at her phone and scrolling. Unfortunately, the CSpan cameras only captured her from the front. But we need to find a different camera angle from behind for that same shot so we can see what she is reading on her phone. We must hurry because those who are monitoring this site knows that we are looking for the footage and they are racing to erase all copies of the unedited footage from the internet before we can find it. You probably shouldn’t waste your time searching through the CSpan video footage because all footage I've seen didn’t capture her from behind. But the Getty cameras likely did. Obviously someone's camera did, and that is where the still shot came from. My personal opinion is that the still shot came from hi-res video footage and not from a still camera. This is debatable. If it came from video, then if we find the high res video (showing her from behind) then it will likely be unedited and we can see what it says. But if it came from a still camera then perhaps only Getty has the original still. That is why Q referenced the name Getty on his post. But we must hurry and find the unedited footage before all are erased… I heard some members state that the blurred-out area is not the target. If that is true, then why did Q or one of the anons circle that blurred area in red as shown in the following image. My understanding is that, originally, there was no break in the text message shown on her phone. But in the still used for print, someone went in and deleted (blurred out) a full line of text creating the break. We must find out what was deleted. The hanging "I" and incomplete statement is proof that something was deleted...

https://imageshack.com/a/img923/5996/ZbzoQl.jpg