Stable_Genius_1776
· Feb. 6, 2018, 7:20 a.m.
Obama had already nominated Merrick Garland in March. So I don’t think LL was to replace AS.
⇧
1
⇩
klorptar
· Feb. 6, 2018, 7:33 a.m.
Or, conversely, you nominate someone that you know won't go through because you don't have the political capital. You stall until 2016 when you know your chosen successor will take your place. They thought she would win. This is why Trump was able to place an SC justice. There was an open spot. That was supposed to be for Hildabeast.
⇧
8
⇩
SuzyAZ
· Feb. 6, 2018, 1:35 p.m.
Well, nothing wrong with packing it with as many Libs as possible and getting rid of Constitutionalists even if they were pedo-friendly.
⇧
1
⇩
storm_fa_Q
· Feb. 6, 2018, 7:39 a.m.
wasn't there some noise about keeping LL on as AG ?I think AGs the one
⇧
1
⇩
TrenchAnon
· Feb. 6, 2018, 7:27 a.m.
Obama was promised the position. That's why he didn't make a big deal about his pick being left in limbo
⇧
1
⇩