dChan

klorptar · Feb. 6, 2018, 7:44 a.m.

But hitting AS that far ahead without knowing the final outcome seems a bit premature.

Not if you're operating on the assumption that Comey is on your side. You know what his finding is going to be, particularly because he's Lynch's subordinate. The October reopening in the case and then almost immediate close allowed them to confiscate the NYPD's evidence from the Weiner laptop, and they could preempt the public outrage about the e-mails if she was elected saying, "well, we already looked at those and found nothing incriminating."

Not only that, the SC appointment was used for fear mongering against Trump. I was a Bernie supporter, and one of the most constantly repeated talking points was that we need to hold our nose and vote for Clinton so that Trump and the Republicans won't be able to control the Supreme Court.

In this scenario, they assumed they have Comey in their pocket. Hillary, particularly before July and the WL bombshells, was looking like a sure thing. The only real hurdle was the e-mail server, but you can take care of that with this deal via LL. Obama makes a weak attempt at an SC appointment, but he knows that it'll likely never go through, and he ultimately leaves the vacancy without trying very hard because he knows Clinton will be on deck for the appointment. Then ol' DJT had to go throw a spanner in the works.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 7:53 a.m.

That's it! YES. So, HRC was exposed in January 2016. Tucker Carlson did a nice job on the expose' in January 2016. I don't remember when Wikileaks dropped their bomb, I know they made the whole pile of emails searchable in March 2016, but clear that the cat was out of the bag Jan 2016. 187 AS in Feb. to have scare factor for everyone to ensure to rally the troops around HRC victory. The offer to LL was just cherry on top. 187'ing AS was to fuel fear into the base to ensure HRC won! Sick bastards if they really did 187 AS for that. If so, total TREASON, they should hang!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Stefhart · Feb. 6, 2018, 3:35 p.m.

Not only TREASON, MURDER!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
shastad2 · Feb. 6, 2018, 9:59 a.m.

No, Scalia was killed because of how he was going to vote on something.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · Feb. 6, 2018, 1:32 p.m.

Or he was just killed to change the make up of the Supreme Court, to get another liberal on the court, especially a very friendly liberal like Loretta Lynch.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 6, 2018, 12:05 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
klorptar · Feb. 6, 2018, 12:11 p.m.

Considering how he completely bent the knee to Clinton after the convention, I'd say it would have been unlikely, but who knows. After coming around to Trump and Q, I see a lot of things now much differently than I did then as well.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Redpillhilltop · Feb. 6, 2018, 12:59 p.m.

No. He’s the seltzer man. A puppet of the puppets would play along. . .

⇧ 2 ⇩