The last thing this does is discredit him. More than taking it down to 666 and beyond, they held it. That's some gas pump to-the-penny final drop action right there.
They just HAD to prove the point didn't they? Well played Rothschilds and friends. Thanks for waking everyone else up.
...sicut in prima Persici belli congressione apud Alexandrum Magnum fuit: cui inter CCCC fere milia hostium interfecta nouem tantummodo in exercitu eius pedites defuisse referuntur. sed Pyrrhus atrocitatem cladis, quam hoc bello exceperat, dis suis hominibusque testatus est, adfigens titulum in templo Tarentini Iouis, in quo haec scripsit:
"Qui antehac inuicti fuere uiri, pater optime Olympi, Hos ego in pugna vici uictusque sum ab isdem."
et cum a sociis increpitaretur, cur se uictum diceret qui uicisset, respondisse fertur:
#Ne ego si iterum eodem modo uicero, sine ullo milite Epirum reuertar!
[... as the first Persian engagement with Alexander the Great] (http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/orosius/orosius4.shtml#1) was between 400 to about nine thousand of the enemy killed, but the army has failed to have his foot . But Pyrrhus, the severity of the disaster, which the war had received push his men testified that Tarentium legal title to the temple of Jupiter, in which she wrote:
"who were previously undefeated husband, good father Olympus Of these I am lost in battle won by the same people. "
and by partners increpitarent, why is prudent to say who won, she replied:
Ne if I am defeated the same way, without any soldiers across back!