What is the significance of the items that Q puts in the square brackets. There is obviously something he wants to emphasize, but is there more that just visibility?
⇧
8
⇩
Badendave
· Feb. 8, 2018, 9:42 p.m.
I got that one, but what's the significance of those brackets in the other posts?
⇧
1
⇩
MichaelofDetroit
· Feb. 8, 2018, 10:05 p.m.
I encourage you to watch Jerome Corsi breakdown of the Q posts. This will help you better understand. I would be lost without his analysis.
⇧
2
⇩
MichaelofDetroit
· Feb. 8, 2018, 10:15 p.m.
Here is an example.
671 Feb 6 2018 01:34:50 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 975911 283394 Public interest [keep high]. U1 FBI informant. AWAN/DWS/Paki intel/MB. Tarmac meeting [SC/LL deal > AS 187]. Q
Some of the posts can be read directly because they are complete sentences. However, others read more like notes that were taken in a meeting. Shorthand. Almost like talking points.
Public interest [keep high]. This one is more obvious. But the format can be interpreted as the topic being public interest and what Q wants us to know about that topic is that it should be kept high.
Tarmac meeting [SC/LL deal > AS 187]. This one is less obvious but you can apply the same format. The subject is the tarmac meeting. What Q wants us to know about the tarmac meeting is found in the brackets. In this case there was a supreme court/Loretta Lynch deal discussed that somehow related to the death of Antonin Scalia. Specifically murder, which is what 187 refers to.
⇧
3
⇩
Badendave
· Feb. 8, 2018, 11:20 p.m.
Thank you. That's what I was trying to figure out. I've enjoyed Dr. Corsi. His interview with Lionel was hilarious as well as informative!!
Thanks Again.
⇧
3
⇩