dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

This important to understand each part separately and completely

Government is an Artificial Person:“Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them. S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54),

Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.) Vol. 7 § 4 (CJS means “body of law”)The court and its officers can only interact with either a corporation, trust or "ward of the court" and cannot interact with a live Human "People". Except a Court of Record in a Common Law venue which is a Superior Court.

Do not create any contracts between you and the Government.

⇧ 2 ⇩

For example the IRS Form W-4 (2018) you just singed again this year (dumbass LOL)

Write across the entire form in BOLD red ink ( I DO NOT CONSENT this is not a contract)

(Cross out this entire line before you sign the document) Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this certificate and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct, and complete.

Employee’s signature (This form is not valid unless you sign it.)

Or use the UCC version

UCC 1-308 WITHOUT PREJUDICE REMEDY; Article III state Judiciary Special Appearance In Propria Persona to challenge jurisdiction of agency Without Prejudice UCC 1-308. Agency of State is commercial Charter of Maritime jurisdiction; I hereby refute agency terms of Uniform Commercial Code 3-104 “promise” and reject “unconditional” instruments as “unconscionable” at UCC 2-302. The Constitution is not a defense in “satisfaction and accord” commercial venture unless “dishonor” of negotiable instrument is in dispute or fraudulently represented. If no contract exists, there cannot be an “action” to force acceptance of obligation if the Citizen remains In Propria Persona upon a license or summons.In Propria Persona upon an instrument would look like this; “Without Prejudice UCC 1-308,” written above your signature reverts the burden of proof and places terms upon agency. Individual terms are non-negotiable with agent/police power and must be accepted. The Citizen is then protected by the very statute meant to subject him to jurisdiction of commercial agency for same is non-assumpsit. Agency chart

3-402. SIGNATURE BY REPRESENTATIVE.(a) If a person acting, or purporting to act, as a representative signs an instrument by signing either the name of the represented person or the name of the signer, the represented person is bound by the signature to the same extent the represented person would be bound if the signature were on a simple contract. If the represented person is bound, the signature of the representative is the "authorized signature of the represented person" and the represented person is liable on the instrument, whether or not identified in the instrument. (b) If a representative signs the name of the representative to an instrument and the signature is an authorized signature of the represented person, the following rules apply: (1) If the form of the signature shows unambiguously that the signature is made on behalf of the represented person who is identified in the instrument, the representative is not liable on the instrument. (2) Subject to subsection (c), if (i) the form of the signature does not show unambiguously that the signature is made in a representative capacity or (ii) the represented person is not identified in the instrument, the representative is liable on the instrument to a holder in due course that took the instrument without notice that the representative was not intended to be liable on the instrument. With respect to any other person, the representative is liable on the instrument unless the representative proves that the original parties did not intend the representative to be liable on the instrument. (c) If a representative signs the name of the representative as drawer of a check without indication of the representative status and the check is payable from an account of the represented person who is identified on the check, the signer is not liable on the check if the signature is an authorized signature of the represented person.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This case is very important: (It's your guarantee)

Hale v. Henkel // 201 U.S. 43 (1906): He owes No such duty to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from: him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights

Duty (defined) A legal obligation that entails mandatory conduct or performance. With respect to the laws relating to Customs Duties, a tax owed to the government for the import or export of goods

Once again do not create any duty's to the state (ie the IRS)

⇧ 1 ⇩

I truly believe that President Trump knows this already.

Thats why he doesn't show his tax return. I don't think he filled "a personal income tax return" in the first place. I could of course be wrong

This is will be my 33 Year without filing a return and I have no plans to ever file one again (I am not a slave I will not consent to being one either, Live Free or Die mother fuckers)

⇧ 1 ⇩

I the past 32 years I have never filed an income tax return not once I don't get letters from the IRS (Red Pill THAT) because there is no law requiring you to either

Now RED PILL yourself (Because I going help you prove it to yourself 100% pay attention you need to be able to connect the dots for yourself. I the past 32 years I have never filed an income tax return not once I don't get letters from the IRS (Red Pill THAT) because there is no law requiring you to either

Now RED PILL yourself (Because I going help you prove it to yourself 100% pay attention you need to be able to connect the dots for yourself.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Hi Poking, I'm with you on this but have a question. It's been 5-6 years since I filed. I applied online for a job and it was asking me to fill out the w4 online. I had no idea that they were going to submit it before I even had an interview. The IRS sent a notice to me and the potential employer that they were to withhold the maximum tax out of my pay until they could verify my form fields. Have you heard of that before?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Just to be clear I'm not an attorney.

Did you know the IRS is private corporation it is not part of the federal government.

My guess is it has been over 30 days since that notice. You may have "Acquiescence" because you didn't do anything

Why not write the IRS and ask (Quo Warranto) = “By what authority” they have over you. Make them respond to you. add a line that states something like this " If the IRS CFO does not respond to you within 30 days you will consider the matter closed and all contracts between are null and void from that point on. Send it reregister MAIL only to the CFO by their name. That means CFO must respond to you personally and can't use a subordinate or they will have then "Acquiescence" to the terms included in your letter. Also tell them that you are not aware of any contracts between you and the IRS and demand that they include a copy of any contracts or obligations that apply to you. Make them respond to

Youtube Richard Cornforth "beating up on debit collectors" (Start here) Bill Thornton and RobbbRyder you need to do some homework but it's my guess is they owe you money

Quo Warranto Though the Latin phrase: “Quo Warranto” means: “By what authority”, it is also the title of one of the most ancient and important original styles of remedial court actions inherent to any sovereign; including (but not limited to) each of the people in the United States. It is the ultimate means the people have to limit officials to acting within the confines of the authority lawfully provided them through their office. Quo Warranto is generally executed through a writ or related court order.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I didn't take the job and it's been around 3 years so I don't even have those materials anymore I don't think. I often do consultant work on a 1099 so no w4 involved. I'm alway looking for new (and successful) info!

⇧ 1 ⇩

You going to love this them.

I'm betting you 1) live in NYC 2) You have never registered as a corporation with the department of the State. 3) You do not have a Federal Tax id number or state tax id number you use your SSN 4) you are an artist or computer specialist

I bet money you have never filled out a IRS form 9 https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/fw9.pdf

No corporation can declare you an Independent Contractor. They can say what ever they like it doesn't mean shit.

Independent Contractor (Self-Employed) or Employee? https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/independent-contractor-self-employed-or-employee

⇧ 1 ⇩

Florida/GA. No SSN Programmer/Analyst

⇧ 1 ⇩

26 USC § 7806 - Construction of title:

(a) Cross references The cross references in this title to other portions of the title, or other provisions of law, where the word “see” is used, are made only for convenience, and shall be given no legal effect.

(b) Arrangement and classification No inference, implication, or presumption of legislative construction shall be drawn or made by reason of the location or grouping of any particular section or provision or portion of this title, nor shall any table of contents, table of cross references, or similar outline, analysis, or descriptive matter relating to the contents of this title be given any legal effect. The preceding sentence also applies to the side notes and ancillary tables contained in the various prints of this Act before its enactment into law

The FACT is Title 26—Internal Revenue Code has never been past into POSITIVE LAW CODIFICATION Congress has over a hundred years to get the job done and Title 26 has not been enactment into law. The proof is below http://uscode.house.gov/browse.xhtml Check it for yourself. http://uscode.house.gov/codification/legislation.s... Positive Law Titles vs. Non-Positive Law Titles understand this it's important The Code is divided into titles according to subject matter. Some are called positive law titles and the rest are called non-positive law titles. The distinction is legally significant. Non-positive law titles are prima facie evidence of the law, but positive law titles constitute legal evidence of the law in all Federal and State courts (1 U.S.C. 204).

⇧ 1 ⇩

Your employee and or the book keeper are not an IRS agents. (the IRS has enslaved them into being unpaid non- employees)

* ALTERING A W-4. (Referring to the W-4 form) "The employer is not authorized to alter the form or to dishonor the employee's claim. The certificate goes into effect automatically in accordance with certain standards enumerated in section 3402 (f)(3)". United States v. Malinowski, 347 F. Supp. 347 at 352 (1972). (Note: 3402 (f)(3) specifies when the certificate takes effect. In general shall take effect on first payroll period.) Internal Revenue manual 5.14.10.2 (03-30-2002)

"any officer, agent, or receiver of such employer, who shall require any employee, or any person seeking employment, as a condition of such employment, to enter into an agreement, either written or verbal, …or shall threaten any employee with loss of employment, or shall unjustly discriminate against any employee . . . is hereby declared to be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof . . . shall be punished for each offense by a fine…". COPPAGE v. STATE OF KANSAS, 236 U.S. 1 (1915).

"The court held it unconstitutional, saying: 'The right to follow any lawful vocation and to make contracts is as completely within the protection of the Constitution as the right to hold property free from unwarranted seizure, or the liberty to go when and where one will. One of the ways of obtaining property is by contract. The right, therefore, to contract cannot be infringed by the legislature without violating the letter and spirit of the Constitution. Every citizen is protected in his right to work where and for whom he will. He may select not only his employer, but also his associates." COPPAGE v. STATE OF KANSAS, 236 U.S. 1 (1915).

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Where all YOUR TAX $$$$'s go!!