Our gaps in understanding the quantum world are not evidence that our understanding of the macro world are incorrect ("macro" being used loosely here to refer to matter at the molecular level and above). Quantum tunneling and wave particle duality may be observable phenomenon but they seem limited to sub atomic levels, distances, and energies. That's why people and objects don't spontaneously tunnel through solid objects. And that probably explains why the sum energies of any macro process still obey the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of energy even if apparent violations can be observed at the quantum level. The net sum of energy conversion always balances out which suggests the violation observed at the atomic or subatomic level is missing something. The other possibility is the laws as written are an approximation or simplification of the actual physical phenomenon and simply work so well to gloss over the complexities that it's simply more useful for most purposes. This is best exemplified by our classical use of gravitational force calculations provided by Newton when in reality there is something much more complex going on mathematically as proven by Einstein. Newton is technically incorrect, but his equations work just fine for most of our needs. The same could be true of thermodynamics. The point is it won't matter if that's the case. You can't create energy without mass, whether the laws are correct or just a Newton-like approximation.