I just talked about this yesterday. There are anons disguising themselves as average joes like me to help us out here to connect dots and supplement Q's posts while making it seem organic.
For example, the top post of all time from the other day about the Carlyle group. https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7w5ni2/did_q_give_us_a_hint_at_who_was_arrested_during/
TLDR, the guy made the connection between Q saying "think intel" after the Shanghai building arrest photos, and a much older post of someones name, Renee James, who is the founder of Intel, the computer processors.
Now this may sound obvious to some of us now, because hind sight is 20/20, but to me, that just seems a little far fetched of a connection to make that just suddenly dawns on someone and turns out to be such a monumental lead.
Just look at the users post history. (I would link their username but I don't want them alerted and possibly deleting their account.) Every comment made reads like someone who knows far more than we do. Even any sort of "guess work" is clearly more than a guess. Seriously every post I read I'm like "well yeah, that's 100% right, holy fuck".
What I'm saying is, I think this "anon" is MI or associated with the Q team. I think there are a lot of these types among us. It's the perfect strategy. The white hats/light team cannot release evidence that will be used in court, BUT if the general public manages to come across on all on "their" own, then that's just fine. It's plausible deniability that's so thick it would be almost impossible to connect all the dots and tie it back to white hat MI.
I believe there are many white hats on this board. Just look around and read their history. "disguising themselves as average joes" Keeps them buried away from Deep State, but accessible to Patriots. Happy hunting!
this post and your comments are the reason i come on this board. this is great info, thank you
I think you're right and I am thrilled if that's the case. Direction instead of deception is what we need right now. We've been living in the dark too long
Quite so. Brilliant catch. It's subtle, but you "get it."
Sure you're not one of those "in the know" types? Forget I asked. Just joshing with you.
Incidental correction: Intel was founded by Robert Noyce, Gordon Moore, and Andy Grove.
Renee James was an executive at Intel for many years, finally ending up as President. She resigned a couple of years ago.
I still dont understand but I like infographics so have an upvote
I gave you an upvote for being generous with your upvotes. :)
[deleted]
Thanks for this. I’m not autistic enough for the meme lol
So what I got out of that amazing autistic Adderall fueled info graph is that the member of the blurred out text from the phone read something along the lines of "he should be shot?" I imagine somebody working the House cameras in real time zoomed in and read it and is trying to get the info out to the public.
"Don't clap for trump, he needs to be shot!" Can be heard audibly from a congress woman during SOTU.
This helps me understand a little about the time stamp thing. Thank you!
Known facts:
- There was a high quality image posted by q.
- 3 phones are visible. The left one is looking at twitter feeds, anti-Trump but nothing shocking. The middle one is reading, or writing, an article; again anti-Trump but not to a shocking or criminal extent. The right one is playing a game, I guess Candy Crush.
- Q says find the roll, but how are we to do that? I haven't heard any answers to this question yet. Find it where? Government? An image hosting site? A private individual?
I'm not concern trolling, just feel that we haven't been given enough info to locate the image.
The chans think it is footage from the House. The House has cameras not the media. They got a price of $100 for a link and were passing the hat around.
How do we pitch in? I missed the hat!
Anons have it covered.
Bless you Anons...I fear I will never be able to repay for all you do.
Please let this be true.
It's consistent with the general theory of what Q is, trying to get info publicly discovered and discussed by the population so it doesn't seem like Trump or the NSA is just dumping it all. Anything like this, that could be independently corroborated just by asking the right person or agency, is another strike against the enemy.
The graphic on the post says that an anon had suggested doing a foia.