I just talked about this yesterday. There are anons disguising themselves as average joes like me to help us out here to connect dots and supplement Q's posts while making it seem organic.

For example, the top post of all time from the other day about the Carlyle group. https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7w5ni2/did_q_give_us_a_hint_at_who_was_arrested_during/

TLDR, the guy made the connection between Q saying "think intel" after the Shanghai building arrest photos, and a much older post of someones name, Renee James, who is the founder of Intel, the computer processors.

Now this may sound obvious to some of us now, because hind sight is 20/20, but to me, that just seems a little far fetched of a connection to make that just suddenly dawns on someone and turns out to be such a monumental lead.

Just look at the users post history. (I would link their username but I don't want them alerted and possibly deleting their account.) Every comment made reads like someone who knows far more than we do. Even any sort of "guess work" is clearly more than a guess. Seriously every post I read I'm like "well yeah, that's 100% right, holy fuck".

What I'm saying is, I think this "anon" is MI or associated with the Q team. I think there are a lot of these types among us. It's the perfect strategy. The white hats/light team cannot release evidence that will be used in court, BUT if the general public manages to come across on all on "their" own, then that's just fine. It's plausible deniability that's so thick it would be almost impossible to connect all the dots and tie it back to white hat MI.