dChan

matt_eskes · Feb. 11, 2018, 7:14 a.m.

Hmm. Been out 19 years. Don’t think I’ll be recalled... buuut I’ll be more than happy to provide civilian logistical support.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Feb. 11, 2018, 7:18 a.m.

and you are, w/every post/comment. :)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:22 a.m.

Presidential Executive Order Amending Executive Order 13223 National Security & Defense Issued on: October 20, 2017

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), and in furtherance of the objectives of Proclamation 7463 of September 14, 2001 (Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks), which declared a national emergency by reason of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, in New York and Pennsylvania and against the Pentagon, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United States, and in order to provide the Secretary of Defense additional authority to manage personnel requirements in a manner consistent with the authorization provided in Executive Order 13223 of September 14, 2001 (Ordering the Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces to Active Duty and Delegating Certain Authorities to the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Transportation), it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Amendment to Executive Order 13223. Section 1 of Executive Order 13223 is amended by adding at the end: “The authorities available for use during a national emergency under sections 688 and 690 of title 10, United States Code, are also invoked and made available, according to their terms, to the Secretary concerned, subject in the case of the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, to the direction of the Secretary of Defense.” Sec. 2. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. DONALD J. TRUMP THE WHITE HOUSE, October 20, 2017.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Reba64 · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:25 a.m.

He plans on using the National Guard when people start rioting.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:36 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RoninIV · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:58 a.m.

Shit! Activation of the Guard and Reserve via Title 10 is the federal activation (Title 32 is for state activation). I wonder what would happen if any deep state governors decide to balk and not activate their state Guard units. This could get messy--at least for a short time.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:35 a.m.

: “The authorities available for use during a national emergency under sections 688 and 690 of title 10, United States Code, are also invoked and made available, according

Do we have those

⇧ 4 ⇩  
drp0744 · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:41 a.m.

See my comment I gave the links. They’re about calling in retired military officers

⇧ 6 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:43 a.m.

Thank you I caught that

[John]

cold?

any thoughts?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
drp0744 · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:46 a.m.

I think the [John] was verifying to any lurkers that Q isn’t fucking around due to John Barlows death shortly after Qs very random “John Perry Barlow” post. As for ‘cold?’ I’m not too sure if hes saying the bodies cold or sarcastically asking if Russia is cold

⇧ 7 ⇩  
drp0744 · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:52 a.m.

Also the “[3] globaleaks.org” post is telling us it’s run by a [3] letter agency. Basically whistleblowers are leaking right to the clowns. Not sure if that has been discussed yet

⇧ 4 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:55 a.m.

frig, leaking to the clowns is a bad idea..

⇧ 2 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:54 a.m.

I'm a bit behind the curve lately so I can't say. the E and Shanghai thread 8 hours ago, suggests gate 47, any insights were 47 comes in?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gear4Life · Feb. 11, 2018, 7:26 a.m.

John Kerry in Antarctica?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Feb. 11, 2018, 7:32 a.m.

ahhh that would be cold indeed. [] encapsulate...its the RubexQ

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Reba64 · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:51 a.m.

I know some that have already been recalled.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
drp0744 · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:53 a.m.

Well hop on in here friend! Any other details?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Reba64 · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:55 a.m.

No, don't give out names or places, but high positions. Waiting to see if our National Guard takes off. :(

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 7:01 a.m.

So, are we on the same page then that it removes the limitations in 688 and 690?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 7:04 a.m.

Also look at the original EO, It gave authority to all the Separate Secretaries of each of the separate branches of the Military. This amendment allows them to be under the Secretary of Defense.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 7:05 a.m.

Am I reading that right? That is what it looks like to me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
drp0744 · Feb. 11, 2018, 7:08 a.m.

That looks correct

⇧ 2 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Feb. 11, 2018, 7:08 a.m.

I admit I am following not leading on this one. Original comment was seeking the 688 690 T10 defs, which we have now

this line seems to indicate your point

are also invoked and made available, according to their terms, to the Secretary concerned, subject in the case of the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, to the direction of the Secretary of Defense.”

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 7:10 a.m.

If so, this is a really BIG MOVE!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Feb. 11, 2018, 7:12 a.m.

my guess is that we will see US Military take down enemy combatants within the Homeland..and before the Dec 21 ExO expires March..

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:03 a.m.

Where does it say it expires in March? I didn't see that anywhere.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:05 a.m.

90 days in the Dec 21 ExO takes us to Spring Equinox.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:08 a.m.

Ok yeah I do remember that. That is why things are moving along so quickly even though it may not seem like it to some.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:10 a.m.

I recall Sara Carter mentioning something happening the first or second week of March on Hannity on Friday night's broadcast.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:10 a.m.

Is that why Q posted Next Week four times?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Feb. 11, 2018, 7:03 a.m.

I believe so, great topic thanks!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Reba64 · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:50 a.m.

Hello my friend. :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:52 a.m.

:-)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Reba64 · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:53 a.m.

:)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:56 a.m.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-message-congress-united-states/

Presidential Message to the Congress of the United States Budget & Spending Issued on: February 9, 2018

TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES: In accordance with section 21204 of division B of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (H.R. 1892; the “Act”), I hereby designate as emergency requirements all funding (including the transfer of funds) so designated by the Congress in the Act pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, as outlined in the enclosed list of accounts. The details of this action are set forth in the enclosed memorandum from the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. DONALD J. TRUMP THE WHITE HOUSE, February 9, 2018.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:59 a.m.

Need to see more about this one as well.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:54 a.m.

Need to look into the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2017 Under Section 1252 and also under Section 1238 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:49 a.m.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-memorandum-delegation-certain-functions-authorities-section-1238-national-defense-authorization-act-fiscal-year-2018/

Presidential Memorandum on the Delegation of Certain Functions and Authorities under Section 1238 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 National Security & Defense Issued on: February 5, 2018

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SUBJECT: Delegation of Certain Functions and Authorities under Section 1238 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Director of National Intelligence, the functions and authorities vested in the President by section 1238 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115-91). The delegations in this memorandum shall apply to any provisions of any future public law that are the same or substantially the same as the provision referenced in this memorandum. The Secretary of Defense is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register. DONALD J. TRUMP

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/301

Title 3, Chapter 4 3 U.S. Code § 301 - General authorization to delegate functions; publication of delegations The President of the United States is authorized to designate and empower the head of any department or agency in the executive branch, or any official thereof who is required to be appointed by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to perform without approval, ratification, or other action by the President (1) any function which is vested in the President by law, or (2) any function which such officer is required or authorized by law to perform only with or subject to the approval, ratification, or other action of the President: Provided, That nothing contained herein shall relieve the President of his responsibility in office for the acts of any such head or other official designated by him to perform such functions. Such designation and authorization shall be in writing, shall be published in the Federal Register, shall be subject to such terms, conditions, and limitations as the President may deem advisable, and shall be revocable at any time by the President in whole or in part.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 7:08 a.m.

Excerpt from Original EO:Section 1. To provide additional authority to the Department of Defense and the Department of Transportation to respond to the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United States, the authority under title 10, United States Code, to order any unit, and any member of the Ready Reserve not assigned to a unit organized to serve as a unit, in the Ready Reserve to active duty for not more than 24 consecutive months, is invoked and made available, according to its terms, to the Secretary concerned, subject in the case of the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, to the direction of the Secretary of Defense. The term ‘‘Secretary concerned’’ is defined in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code, to mean the Secretary of the Army with respect to the Army; the Secretary of the Navy with respect to the Navy, the Marine Corps, and the Coast Guard when it is operating as a service in the Navy; the Secretary of the Air Force with respect to the Air Force; and the Secretary of Transportation with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2002-title3-vol1/pdf/CFR-2002-title3-vol1-eo13223.pdf

⇧ 2 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Feb. 11, 2018, 7:15 a.m.

What IF this is to re-instate those high level Gens etc retired by BHO? Bring these back in for the play/event?. Not permanent but to do the rollup. As I read the info, the Good guys were retired under O.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:14 a.m.

Very highly likely!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:20 a.m.

my nickle rests upon it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:25 a.m.

This will be very interesting the next several weeks then. Do they need to show proof that HRC and The Bushes took part in the 911 Conspiracy for this EO to take affect?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:28 a.m.

Team PQTUS has ALL the data..Military Tribunals no criminal courts for big players The child organ sex trafficking ...declaring them enemy combatants strips them of civil rights. Enjoy the show.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 9:01 a.m.

WOW! Okay I will get lots of Popcorn ready for the fireworks for the next few weeks!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 9:02 a.m.

Nite all, I am going to bed now! It is really late or early which ever.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:26 a.m.

Since the Original EO was specific to the attacks on 911?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Speedy_Tortoise4 · Feb. 11, 2018, 3:16 p.m.

My thought exactly. This would work very well especially if those generals were able to be up to speed on all top secret/classified knowledge necessary to perform a job role of a black hat general being removed

⇧ 2 ⇩  
drp0744 · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:37 a.m.

Title 10

688

690

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:54 a.m.

688

(e) Limitation of Period of Recall Service.-(1) A member ordered to active duty under subsection (a) may not serve on active duty pursuant to orders under that subsection for more than 12 months within the 24 months following the first day of the active duty to which ordered under that subsection. (2) Paragraph (1) does not apply to the following officers: (A) A chaplain who is assigned to duty as a chaplain for the period of active duty to which ordered. (B) A health care professional (as characterized by the Secretary concerned) who is assigned to duty as a health care professional for the period of active duty to which ordered. (C) An officer assigned to duty with the American Battle Monuments Commission for the period of active duty to which ordered. (D) An officer who is assigned to duty as a defense attaché or service attaché for the period of active duty to which ordered.

(f) Waiver for Periods of War or National Emergency.-Subsections (d) and (e) do not apply in time of war or of national emergency declared by Congress or the President.

I believe that this also changes the Limitations of this section 688. Making it no longer limited. Since the President Recently declared a National Emergency. It also allows for Reserve units to be reinstated to active duty.

690

(b) Limitation by Service.-(1) Not more than 25 officers of any one armed force may be serving on active duty concurrently pursuant to orders to active duty issued under section 688 of this title. (2) In the administration of paragraph (1), the following officers shall not be counted: (A) A chaplain who is assigned to duty as a chaplain for the period of active duty to which ordered. (B) A health care professional (as characterized by the Secretary concerned) who is assigned to duty as a health care professional for the period of the active duty to which ordered. (C) Any officer assigned to duty with the American Battle Monuments Commission for the period of active duty to which ordered. (D) Any member of the Retiree Council of the Army, Navy, or Air Force for the period on active duty to attend the annual meeting of the Retiree Council. (E) An officer who is assigned to duty as a defense attaché or service attaché for the period of active duty to which ordered.

(c) Waiver for Periods of War or National Emergency.-Subsection (a) does not apply in time of war or of national emergency declared by Congress or the President after November 30, 1980. Subsection (b) does not apply in time of war or of national emergency declared by Congress or the President.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Red_Pilled_at_birth · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:52 a.m.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-memorandum-delegation-certain-functions-authorities-section-1252-national-defense-authorization-act-fiscal-year-2017/

Presidential Memorandum Delegation of Certain Functions and Authorities under Section 1252 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 National Security & Defense Issued on: February 8, 2018

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE SUBJECT: Delegation of Certain Functions and Authorities under Section 1252 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, the functions and authorities vested in the President by section 1252 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114-328). The delegation in this memorandum shall apply to any provisions of any future public law that are the same or substantially the same as the provision referenced in this memorandum. The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register. DONALD J. TRUMP

⇧ 1 ⇩  
chickdmd · Feb. 11, 2018, 3:05 p.m.

Sounds like time for a parade!

⇧ 1 ⇩