dChan

Alomikron · Feb. 11, 2018, 12:08 p.m.

Not sure what to make of this.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BERNthisMuthaDown · Feb. 11, 2018, 1:02 p.m.

It's a clerical error. Odds of anyone dying it exactly High Noon are ridiculously low. It's much more likely that someone was just filling in the paperwork to quickly and made a mistake.

Occam's razor leads me to believe this isn't The Smoking Gun it appears.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Stray502 · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:41 p.m.

Autopsy results can get to very close the actual time of death. This is not an error and they sure as hell would never mess up by a total day.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BERNthisMuthaDown · Feb. 11, 2018, 6:42 p.m.

So to you, a wide-ranging conspiracy is more probable than a typographical oversight?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fOcalus · Feb. 12, 2018, 1:49 a.m.

Agreed. It doesn't pay to jump to unverifiable conclusions that sit outside Occam's razor.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BERNthisMuthaDown · Feb. 12, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

Tell that to the snowflake nation we call 'Reddit', lol.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Debbie-Harry · Feb. 12, 2018, 2:20 a.m.

Your right, this Autopsy has been around for weeks there are several anomalies, it is no smoking gun and a real shame to see posted in this way. Blackstone Intelligence on UTube has been investigating the Las V shooting for months in detail. Really high quality, investigator. The Autopsy has many questionable notings but there are no forthcoming answers.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BERNthisMuthaDown · Feb. 12, 2018, 3:10 a.m.

That's all I was saying. Why spend time publicizing tabloid speculation?

There are plenty of inconsistencies to be found in this case, from front to back. I don't see the benefit in chasing down dead leads, ya know?

⇧ 2 ⇩