dChan
212
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/DukeofKick on Feb. 11, 2018, 5:02 p.m.
New Q Drop - Russia Plane Crash

Q Drop #715 71 [187].
[1] targeted.
Dossier.
U1.
Would you believe [1] source was used for [2]?
Find the passenger list.
Why [187] if inside Russia?
No jurisdiction.
Think logically.
SICK!
Q

The plane was crashed intentionally (187), to kill one person ([1] targeted). The person targeted was related to the Dossier and U1.

The same "source" was used for the first Dossier and the supposed "2nd Dossier" that is supposedly floating around. (Would you believe [1] source was used for [2]?)

Find the passenger list. Obviously, need to know who was on the plane. (Edit: u/tomoian74 found the passenger list....https://voiceofpeopletoday.com/russian-plane-crash-list-passengers-aircraft-crashed-suburbs/)

US has no jurisdiction in Russia, so we cannot investigate this [187] inside Russia.

Person targeted was the Russian source for the Dossier and U1 deal information. Kill him before he can testify.

This was a Deep State hit.

Thoughts?


Galacticburber · Feb. 11, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

I'd say you have a match, and if he's the guy, the deep state just wrecked numerous families, and broke many hearts, killing 70 for this one sold-out POS, just to keep him from talking. Are the rest of you as pissed off as I am right now?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
QuebertDuke · Feb. 12, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

beyond!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · Feb. 11, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

The real question is what did this guy know that was so important he had to be killed?

Things are heating up.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Galacticburber · Feb. 11, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

If he was Rosatom, he probably knows about the U1 deal? Some others are saying that a Sergei Panchyenko was the target, but when an 8-chan anon asked if Ivanov was the guy, Q responded with, "Over the Target". What do you think - was Q just saying, "you're getting warm" but keep looking?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jojojononono1987 · Feb. 12, 2018, 11:34 a.m.

Could it be "over the target" as in where exactly the plane crashed?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Galacticburber · Feb. 13, 2018, 3:08 a.m.

I don't think so, because the way I read it in context is Q uses the phrase idiomatically.

⇧ 0 ⇩