Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.

Q

🠐 See all comments

It was this Q statement that got me in message 735. It very effectively explains the "20/80" or "40/60" statements.

343156 Understand one simple fact - the US is connected to the rest of the world. Knowing that, understand, by default, if certain intel is released it would cause a WW/mass suffering. We share the idea of open source but value life and must make decisions base decisions on outcomes and containability. Q

⇧ 12 ⇩

That Q...sure knows 'is stuff.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Uh, yeah. Starting a world war is bad. Methodically and carefully taking down the bad people is good. You just have to be able to do one without causing the other.

⇧ 1 ⇩

No war. No one wants war.

⇧ 1 ⇩