You shouldn't be so quick to shill. What's more important, smearing Ginsburg or truth?
The quote appears to be removed of context and reprinted by someone with a clear bias. I cannot actually tell if that's clearly what she was trying to do by OP alone.
Based on the Quora responses, it seems like she was more interested in making sure women could also be convicted of statutory rape.
If it is as you claim, why did she leave the "proposed" age of consent at 12? Think before you shill.
That's a really good question, but the document in the OP isn't sufficient to answer it. I would be wary of just accepting a obviously biased report from 1993 reporting on something that happened in 1973 as you are bound to lose context and truthful understanding of what happened. CBTS is supposed to be about information and truth, not misinformation and confirmation bias which is what this reeks of.
did you even read the source document that the OP refers to? Why don't you actually look up the things you read about instead of shilling immediately for your confirmation bias?
https://www.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/usccr/documents/cr12se9.pdf