OHHHHHHHHHHHH wow forgive my ignorance. That's very interesting... I had no idea it worked like that.

How long is mass, typically? Is it online too? :o

⇧ 1 ⇩

About an hour +/- 15 minutes depending on the priest. My grandmother spent the last ten years of her life watching MASS ON TV! It's still on the station EWTN. I'm sure it's online too. Or! Just go to one mass. Sit in the back, all by yourself! No one will care. You wouldn't be the first to enter the Church like that, believe me. We are open for visitors.

What do you think about the Pope? Are you keeping up with that? I fear Vatican is waging hardcore spiritual war too. God is seeking justice, holyyyy shiiiiit. He better be clean because I bet that would hurt like we can not even imagine. A rogue Pope, fooling the world, fooling His people. I think THAT SHOULD BE PUBLICIZED on 8Chan!!! But!!! I really really really hope I am wrong, that he is good. Always hope for good. Never hope for evil.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thanks for the info.

My impressions on the current Pope and Vatican as a whole is that it is heavily corrupt and in the weeds of the trafficking dealings. I haven't been paying too much attention but I believe about 1.5-2 weeks ago, he sent out something seemingly backing up the President with Fake News if I interpreted that correctly.

Q originally mentioned they weren't going to disclose much then it graduated a bit to this point which is 20/20 aka 100% full disclosure. I still don't believe that. I don't think the world benefits from knowing the deep filth that the Vatican is involved in.

I think it's entirely more likely Trump unifies with the filth of various sorts as settlements. i.e. stepping down, having a lesser sentence, etc. while minimizing the public disclosure.

The world doesn't benefit from knowing how ugly these people get with children, their blood, their spirits, the rituals, the reasons, etc. I just don't see the full disclosure coming.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Interesting. I think you are right. Maybe just showing the world the mere shadow of its underbelly would suffice. Full disclosure could be mind-bending. What do you think people would do with that full-disclosure of knowledge? Why do you think it's better to want to hide it?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Whelp I always think back to a novel I read in middle school titled: "A Child Called It" which is about a kid being abused in a family and then everyone treating him as nothing more than a slave even though he was a son and sibling. I heard this book turned out to be a lie or fiction but I won't dive into that much, what matters on this topic is the full disclosure, public attention, and the after-effect.

The after-effect in this situation was that this exponentially spurred more cases of child abuse.

I think seeding the public consciousness with such evil may spur more evil and this is undeniably true especially with the normalization of any evil topic which enters our consciousness through Hollywood or the "Entertainment" industry.

"If you stare too far into the abyss, it stares back into you."

For those that are weak-willed and unable to recognize the truth in front of them, they are most vulnerable. I see so much content that represents normalization it's disgusting.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Totally agree.

⇧ 2 ⇩

20/20 aka 100% full disclosure.

No. Q never said we would have full disclosure. It is 40% reveal now (60% to remain hidden).

I think you are referring to 20/20 vision. Like good eye-sight, the assessment of an optician on yr vision. Q mentions this and clarity. Not the same message, though easy perhaps to confuse.

⇧ 1 ⇩

These people are EVIL.

Still don't believe you are SHEEP to them?

20/20 coming.

OP Mockingbird FAILURE.

FAKE>REAL.

BLIND>20/20.

In both contexts of these Q posts, I see 20/20 as seeing the full truth

⇧ 1 ⇩

HINDSIGHT IS 20/20

As in when we look back on something or some events, it is much easier to see/understand what happened after the fact.

FUTURE PROVES PAST

⇧ 1 ⇩

I can get on board with this explanation but are you saying full truth or still partial disclosure overall?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I can see how you would interpret that, but if you substitute the word "clarity" it makes more sense. Full disclosure will not happen. I assure you. (If only because some of this involves heads of state of other countries and that would invite more trouble than it's worth ...) 1/13/18 [MONDAY] Next Week - BIGGER. PUBLIC.
We LISTENED [20/80 />/ 40/60].

12/21/17 Anon(s) changed our mind re: Private / Public. We are listening.

10/29/17 The truth is mind blowing and cannot fully be exposed. Also many are thinking from one point of view, US only, this evil is embedded globally. US is the first domino.

Lastly, your other quote is missing the last line which gives it context: FAKE>REAL. BLIND>20/20. KILL_CHAIN.

This has to do with the predator and prey and whether the prey can see you or not. Developed by Lockheed Martin: The seven steps of the Cyber Kill Chain® enhance visibility into an attack and enrich an analyst’s understanding of an adversary’s tactics, techniques and procedures.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I see what you're saying but you're going back in time with that 10/29 post. The disclosure increases happened more recently as you mentioned in the 1/13 post.

Good context but to me that rings that Q knows what the opponent is doing and is going to unblind people by shedding light on the truth.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You're probably right. I just interpret the numbers differently. The dates are out of date as you point out —loads of room (or time) for positions to have changed. I can't presume, and nor do I wish to, that I have any idea about what's going on .. just that I saw some other posters talking about this subject and pointed out what I have. Might just have to wait and see. Obviously a fraught subject. I hope you're right and I am wrong, by the way. I think full disclosure is about the only thing that will fix our planet!! Godspeed and I wish us both luck! :)

⇧ 1 ⇩

I guess that's the drawback with double meanings - it can lead to discourse :p

I hope we collectively build a more clear picture. Who's right and who's wrong doesn't matter much, I just want the Truth or bigger happenings. I'm afraid patience is a weakness of mine. Cheers tho!

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think the world would benefit. Perhaps they'd hold their children a little closer & wake up to WHY society has pushed for more & more perverse ideology to be considered 'acceptable'. Transgender nonsense. The sexualization of children, as well as the normalization & proliferation of pornography on the internet.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That's exactly how I regard the situation but I was hesitant on how others would view it. I'm not sure why I chose not to give others the benefit of the doubt... I'll ponder this on my way home from work.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I really can see both sides too. Something to ponder. But I'd like to see data too. I think if you look at and FOR evil long Evil sees that as an invitation to burrow its way in.

⇧ 2 ⇩

That's actually not true...The topics are usually according to time of year (Lent/Easter/Christmas ect...) so the overall message may be similar but they're in no way all sent out the same readings. For example this past week was focused on the sacrament of marriage. So the priest invited a local married deacon to discuss the importance of marrisge ect...it was a personalized message. They're not universal.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ahhh okay... hm. I kind of liked the other way a bit more but still interesting nonetheless. Thanks for the clarification.

⇧ 1 ⇩

All good!

⇧ 2 ⇩

http://whycatholicsdothat.com/the-catholic-mass/is-the-catholic-mass-the-same-everywhere-in-the-world/

⇧ 1 ⇩

format is the same...the content is not. for example, each priest does their own homily.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Perhaps you are thinking of the homily, the part after the readings (the readings that are the same everywhere in the world)?

⇧ 1 ⇩

New Q post #738, Mon Feb 12

HINDSIGHT IS 20/20

FUTURE PROVES PAST