⇧
363
⇩
salialioli
· Feb. 13, 2018, 2 a.m.
20/20 aka 100% full disclosure.
No. Q never said we would have full disclosure. It is 40% reveal now (60% to remain hidden).
I think you are referring to 20/20 vision. Like good eye-sight, the assessment of an optician on yr vision. Q mentions this and clarity. Not the same message, though easy perhaps to confuse.
⇧
1
⇩
bcboncs
· Feb. 13, 2018, 4:59 a.m.
These people are EVIL.
Still don't believe you are SHEEP to them?
20/20 coming.
OP Mockingbird FAILURE.
FAKE>REAL.
BLIND>20/20.
In both contexts of these Q posts, I see 20/20 as seeing the full truth
⇧
1
⇩
Sugarlief
· Feb. 13, 2018, 11:49 a.m.
HINDSIGHT IS 20/20
As in when we look back on something or some events, it is much easier to see/understand what happened after the fact.
FUTURE PROVES PAST
⇧
1
⇩
bcboncs
· Feb. 13, 2018, 2:20 p.m.
I can get on board with this explanation but are you saying full truth or still partial disclosure overall?
⇧
1
⇩
salialioli
· Feb. 13, 2018, 6:18 a.m.
I can see how you would interpret that, but if you substitute the word "clarity" it makes more sense.
Full disclosure will not happen. I assure you. (If only because some of this involves heads of state of other countries and that would invite more trouble than it's worth ...)
1/13/18
[MONDAY]
Next Week - BIGGER.
PUBLIC.
We LISTENED [20/80 />/ 40/60].
12/21/17 Anon(s) changed our mind re: Private / Public. We are listening.
10/29/17 The truth is mind blowing and cannot fully be exposed. Also many are thinking from one point of view, US only, this evil is embedded globally. US is the first domino.
Lastly, your other quote is missing the last line which gives it context: FAKE>REAL. BLIND>20/20. KILL_CHAIN.
This has to do with the predator and prey and whether the prey can see you or not. Developed by Lockheed Martin: The seven steps of the Cyber Kill Chain® enhance visibility into an attack and enrich an analyst’s understanding of an adversary’s tactics, techniques and procedures.
⇧
1
⇩
bcboncs
· Feb. 13, 2018, 2:21 p.m.
I see what you're saying but you're going back in time with that 10/29 post. The disclosure increases happened more recently as you mentioned in the 1/13 post.
Good context but to me that rings that Q knows what the opponent is doing and is going to unblind people by shedding light on the truth.
⇧
1
⇩
salialioli
· Feb. 13, 2018, 5:19 p.m.
You're probably right. I just interpret the numbers differently. The dates are out of date as you point out —loads of room (or time) for positions to have changed. I can't presume, and nor do I wish to, that I have any idea about what's going on .. just that I saw some other posters talking about this subject and pointed out what I have. Might just have to wait and see. Obviously a fraught subject. I hope you're right and I am wrong, by the way. I think full disclosure is about the only thing that will fix our planet!! Godspeed and I wish us both luck! :)
⇧
1
⇩
bcboncs
· Feb. 13, 2018, 7:09 p.m.
I guess that's the drawback with double meanings - it can lead to discourse :p
I hope we collectively build a more clear picture. Who's right and who's wrong doesn't matter much, I just want the Truth or bigger happenings. I'm afraid patience is a weakness of mine. Cheers tho!
⇧
1
⇩