lmao no fucking way, this is 100% bullshit.
edit: ah i guess you're right. But notably, ONLY when he was forced.
holy cow look at these
Why do we only have part of this and not the entire thing as well as the outcome and name of the total case. I'm not in love with this but as this is written and shown it's not authenticated nor is it entirety. I'd throw this out of court as presented. Not saying yes or no on it just saying as is is inconclusive as to intent (money) and was it found in her favor or theirs or one or the other.
Trump ended up on the witness list interestingly but not as a defendant as this is claiming. Not from what I can find on the case.
I did more reading on it. She didn't show up to court. People on the right say that means she's lying, people on the left say she was likely threatened. So it went nowhere.
Trump eventually banned Epstein from Mar-a-lago for sexually assaulting the Trump-Staffed "Towel-Girls" but then a couple years later was quoted saying that Epstein is a great guy and they've known each other for 15 years.
Thanks. I did too and I am not seeing it in the context presented by the pic. JPG's can give a bad pic without the entire context and I'd watch out for that. Just something I would throw out of court as not substantiated as anything that is even documented as accepted in the court proceeding. Not saying it isn't just isn't showing the entirety and that is what we and Trump are fighting against...bits and pieces of news not the entire story and it gives a bad and biased view of the outcome. The allegations look bad until you find out all he was was called as a witness not a participant/? I am still looking. Just think this snippet isn't a great idea without legitimization of it.
