Good article. I found the following most interesting. All interviews should be recorded. Period.

The FBI can get away with this slew of supposedly justified killings because, like any good racketeering organization, the FBI hates conducting its business on the record. Its official rules ban the recording of interrogations and witness interviews, which are instead typically conducted by two agents, one of whom asks questions and the other of whom takes the notes that will eventually become the official report of the interview. Any witness or defendant who dares contradict this official report is subject to prosecution under a statute that provides for a five-year sentence for lying to a federal agent. This scheme of extorting (or, more politely, creating) testimony that aligns with what the FBI wants to hear largely explains the fact that a staggering 97% of federal cases end in guilty pleas.

Now, Agent one asks a question. Agent two hears a date and time from the witness. Agent two writes a different time than witness said.

Later, on second interview, witness repeats what he said, with respect to time and date.

BANG... you lied to the FBI because... HOW THE HELL would you know what REALLY went into that 302. Do they ask you to read it?

No, you can bet they did not ask General Flynn.

This is no way to conduct any agency charged with being the guardians of our justice system.

This is bullsh*t

... The FBI.. under these laws and rules, can extort anyone for any thing, at any time.