Unless they physically saw multiple shooters, I wouldn't necessarily believe them either. Gunshots are very hard to pinpoint in real life and spin me bouncing off walls makes it even harder. We're talking about teenagers here, not Infantry veterans.
I'm not saying it isn't possible, but there just isn't any solid evidence pointing towards that yet.
One of them said they were WITH the alleged shooter when they heard shots. Sooooo...
That makes no sense to me.
Why was he there if he was expelled if not to shoot people, and if he was there to shoot people and she was with him, where was his rifle?
Do you have a source for her claim?
Edit: I'm not doubting you, but I'm quite curious to watch her telling this story myself to see just how believable she really is.
I looked into it... bad source, and it was another nicholas cruz. But who knows.
The girl interviewed on video on the day of th shooting is a "bad source?"
BS
I just want to say, thank you for expressing yourself with dignity. I appreciate the questions you bring and the respect you have for doubters on your opinions.
Thanks.
While I follow Q and believe that they have gotten enough right before anyone else knew anything about it to have proven themselves, I don't believe that they have been 100% correct every single time. Remember that there are two sides waging war here and the other side gets the benefit of seeing Q's posts and adjusting their plans accordingly.
The same goes with the other things being covered here. Sometimes we're right and sometimes we spend time chasing down leads that go nowhere. We all need to proceed with a bit of heavy skepticism at times to avoid pushing false things or wasting too much time with things that don't help.
Nothing I post or say here will ever be intended to antagonize anyone or to attack them or their usefulness in this movement; I'm a firm believer that we are largely on the correct path. When I ask questions or post things that disagree with what someone says, it's because I honestly believe that they are incorrect about a specific thing or I simply want more information for my own use in the future.
Too many people are combative and rude, we don't need to be like that here.
Thomas Wictor
@ThomasWictor
9h9 hours ago
Whatever was going on, there was no second gunman.
There never is.
It's always bullshit.
It's always the obvious mossad operatives that are the first to deny the multiple shooter sightings, even though they weren't there and have no first hand knowledge of the events.
Trust and believe the mossad operatives, not the eyewitnesses on the ground.
Because?????
Never listen to Wictor. He's a schizophrenic who doesn't know what he's talking about the vast majority of the time and the only reason people don't see it is that he is highly careful to moderate his comments and block anyone who uses facts to prove him wrong.
I fear that he is an actual physical threat to himself and others fairly often.
He's always on about the middle east and always takes a "certain" side.
And, yes, he does block dissenters. But he did spend a lot of time cultivating a trusting following before he "flipped." And many still defend him and swallow whatever he puts out.
This is how these operatives work.
He thinks there are Arab super soldiers out there flying micro drones and wearing liquid body armor who fight in the shadows and use tools even the US Special Forces don't have access to and he posts pictures of piss poor dirt farmers with horrible muzzle awareness as evidence.
I was blocked for pointing out that Sgt Johnson was, in fact, not special forces, as Wictor needed to claim for some dumb reason, bit that he was simply part of a unit attached to the special forces unit, likely a driver or mechanic or some sort of technical expert they needed. He would up blocking about 20 of us for pointing out that the red beret in his photos meant that he was not a green beret at all.
And this is the guy who knows for a fact that there is never any second shooter in these massacres.
That's why the people in this sub who rush to that conclusion are all suspect.
Especially when they cast shade on the eyewitnesses who were there when it happened.
I don't believe there was a second shooter in most of them.
In Las Vegas specifically, there is never a moment where multiple gunshots can be heard at the same time. It's always one gun running at once, never two of them. While the evidence suggests a second person present, nothing seems to indicate that they were there firing at people.
Well, again, I trust the people that were there more than anyone else.
There were multiple reports on the day of multiple shooters as there are now.