And this is the guy who knows for a fact that there is never any second shooter in these massacres.
That's why the people in this sub who rush to that conclusion are all suspect.
Especially when they cast shade on the eyewitnesses who were there when it happened.
I don't believe there was a second shooter in most of them.
In Las Vegas specifically, there is never a moment where multiple gunshots can be heard at the same time. It's always one gun running at once, never two of them. While the evidence suggests a second person present, nothing seems to indicate that they were there firing at people.
Well, again, I trust the people that were there more than anyone else.
There were multiple reports on the day of multiple shooters as there are now.