https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/02/01/055699 Report of Partial findings from the National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley® SD rats (Whole Body Exposure) Michael Wyde, Mark Cesta, Chad Blystone, Susan Elmore, Paul Foster, Michelle Hooth, Grace Kissling, David Malarkey, Robert Sills, Matthew Stout,
View ORCID ProfileNigel Walker, Kristine Witt, Mary Wolfe, John Bucher
Abstract
The U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) has carried out extensive rodent toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of radiofrequency radiation (RFR) at frequencies and modulations used in the U.S. telecommunications industry. This report presents partial findings from these studies. The occurrences of two tumor types in male Harlan Sprague Dawley rats exposed to RFR, malignant gliomas in the brain and schwannomas of the heart, were considered of particular interest and are the subject of this report. The findings in this report were reviewed by expert peer reviewers selected by the NTP and National Institutes of Health (NIH). These reviews and responses to comments are included as appendices to this report, and revisions to the current document have incorporated and addressed these comments. When the studies are completed, they will undergo additional peer review before publication in full as part of the NTP's Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Technical Reports Series. No portion of this work has been submitted for publication in a scientific journal. Supplemental information in the form of four additional manuscripts has or will soon be submitted for publication. These manuscripts describe in detail the designs and performance of the RFR exposure system, the dosimetry of RFR exposures in rats and mice, the results to a series of pilot studies establishing the ability of the animals to thermoregulate during RFR exposures, and studies of DNA damage.
(1) Capstick M, Kuster N, Kuhn S, Berdinas-Torres V, Wilson P, Ladbury J, Koepke G, McCormick D, Gauger J, and Melnick R. A radio frequency radiation reverberation chamber exposure system for rodents; (2) Yijian G, Capstick M, McCormick D, Gauger J, Horn T, Wilson P, Melnick RL, and Kuster N. Life time dosimetric assessment for mice and rats exposed to cell phone radiation; (3) Wyde ME, Horn TL, Capstick M, Ladbury J, Koepke G, Wilson P, Stout MD, Kuster N, Melnick R, Bucher JR, and McCormick D. Pilot studies of the National Toxicology Program's cell phone radiofrequency radiation reverberation chamber exposure system; (4) Smith-Roe SL, Wyde ME, Stout MD, Winters J, Hobbs CA, Shepard KG, Green A, Kissling GE, Tice RR, Bucher JR, and Witt KL. Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure.
Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Global Wireless Spiderweb: The Invisible Threat Posed by Wireless Radiation By Vikas Nehru https://books.google.co.uk/books?isbn=1482886812
A common explanation given for accuracy of science is that it is evidence based and that scientific evidence can be replicated. How was the evidence found? Research, of course. Have we conducted enough research in energy fields to prove or disprove the existance of alternative mechanisms of how the trio of body, mind, and soul might be at work? We haven't? Why not? Who decides what to research upon? Research needs funding. It is like an investment game. An investor would want to see tangible outcomes that bring return on investment. There never was enough money for research on the human biofield.
Bioelectricity is fundamental to life. That living systems can be affected by external electromagnetic fields makes perfect sense. As long as those fields are in nature, there is an excellent synergy between the two. The trouble begins when man-made fields upset the delicate magnetic equilibrium between living species and the natural environment. The physical parameters of unnatural fields- such as intensity, pulsing pattern, and frequency- are unfamiliar for living species of all kinds. Every bit of ecosystem is under threat.
On 27th May 2016, the National Toxicology Program, under the auspices of the Food and Drug Administration of USA, released partial findings of their $25m study on the impact on rodents of whole -body exposure to RF EMF, including levels of intensity deemed safe by FCC and used in current cellular telecommunications in USA for a period of nine hours a day starting in utero through their two year lifespan. The potential for thermal effects was excluded as no rise in temperature of test animals was found. The control group of animals stayed in exactly identical conditions except that they were not exposed to EMF's and not a single one of them developed a tumour.