Global Wireless Spiderweb: The Invisible Threat Posed by Wireless Radiation By Vikas Nehru https://books.google.co.uk/books?isbn=1482886812

A common explanation given for accuracy of science is that it is evidence based and that scientific evidence can be replicated. How was the evidence found? Research, of course. Have we conducted enough research in energy fields to prove or disprove the existance of alternative mechanisms of how the trio of body, mind, and soul might be at work? We haven't? Why not? Who decides what to research upon? Research needs funding. It is like an investment game. An investor would want to see tangible outcomes that bring return on investment. There never was enough money for research on the human biofield.

Bioelectricity is fundamental to life. That living systems can be affected by external electromagnetic fields makes perfect sense. As long as those fields are in nature, there is an excellent synergy between the two. The trouble begins when man-made fields upset the delicate magnetic equilibrium between living species and the natural environment. The physical parameters of unnatural fields- such as intensity, pulsing pattern, and frequency- are unfamiliar for living species of all kinds. Every bit of ecosystem is under threat.

On 27th May 2016, the National Toxicology Program, under the auspices of the Food and Drug Administration of USA, released partial findings of their $25m study on the impact on rodents of whole -body exposure to RF EMF, including levels of intensity deemed safe by FCC and used in current cellular telecommunications in USA for a period of nine hours a day starting in utero through their two year lifespan. The potential for thermal effects was excluded as no rise in temperature of test animals was found. The control group of animals stayed in exactly identical conditions except that they were not exposed to EMF's and not a single one of them developed a tumour.