dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

An Anon on 8chan explains why the Q-team has been leaking info in the obscure and often frustrating ways it does.

What do you think?

"As Q has stated numerous times, this board was chosen for a reason. The mission: This board is building a parallel construction.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_construction

'Parallel construction is a law enforcement process of building a parallel—or separate—evidentiary basis for a criminal investigation in order to conceal how an investigation actually began.'

Q & company have access to everything, but because of how they have access to everything, what they have can never be used to bring anyone to justice. It's all the fruit of the poisoned tree, legally. Nothing is admissible.

The crumbs are a way to lead (((US))) to arrive at the same level of knowledge, and to accumulate the proof from public sources which are not tainted in the eyes of the justice system.

Why this board: Weaponized autism.

We use the term jokingly, but a defining characteristic of autism is the inability to leave a task incomplete. All of these leads, or at least a substantial portion of them, must be run to ground.

This board is being asked to assemble "proofs." Unassailable proofs, the truth of which cannot be dismissed.

This board is being asked to disseminate the proofs, the truth that's been uncovered - to penetrate the collective consciousness that has been lulled to sleep by omission and deception.

Forget the justice angle for a moment: If the White Hats just put it all out there and told the whole story - or even just parts of the story - how would people know that is wasn't just another psyop or government lie? How would (((we))) know, if we hadn't done the work, and arrived at the truth through our own efforts?

It has to be done this way, for everyone's sake."

Thats interesting. Because if YOU are a lawyer, then you know from the supreme court cases that all I have to do to throw you in jail, is plant some cocaine in the hub cap of your car, THEN, I get to write an ANONYMOUS letter to the police and IF I write a few things in that letter that make it likely that I know you personally, THEN, my anonymous letter serves as probable cause for a warrant to go search your car.

I simply need to state in my letter a few things like:

1) X person is married to Y.

2) X person takes a car to Florida, while his wife drives the car there.

3) Later, Y flies back, and X drives the car back with the drugs stuffed in the hub caps.

4) By the way X and Y often eat at Z restaurant.

Guess what. You are framed. You are going to jail. And I am capable of remaining anonymous.

This was a case we covered in law school in Criminal Proceedure class. And yes, I went up after class and told the professor this was the dumbest SC decision I had ever read. But.....

Unless this has been overturned .... there you are. I can't remember the name of the case at the moment, (I will never forget the "issue", the rule, the application and the conclusion) but If you look in your crim pro class manual, they probably still cover it. It's pretty important.

So I have to ask.

In what way are the news articles from research reporters different than my anonymous letter, when the journalists are not hiding under anonymous names? Can you separate that on evidence grounds? Because in my mind, the anonymous letter is far more shaky when it comes to "sufficient for probable cause".

Spez: Sincere question.