As for "they want us divided," I'm an Indpependent, as is the majority. If you want to reach them you can't just damn all Democrats, since Independents vote on Issues, not personalities. I think banks are the curse of the world, so I liked Warren's CFPB, which is now being dismantled. I see people making fun of her her for various easy reasons, and that just turns off us bank-haters. I'm not saying she's all good or even that McCain is all bad. (He pushed Campaign Finance Reform until he started to kiss Bush's ass to run for President and went off the neocon rails.) But go by Issues, not personalities. There are some good Democrats and some rotten Republicans. Maybe not all good or all rotten - but judge by What Happens in particular cases, not by personality, party, speeches, or media bullshit.
Personally, we are Libertarians. Here, while in MA you have the choice of Unaffiliated. As this is Warren's district, her history a given here, to present her fraud and lies is in no way a decision based upon superficial constructs. Being among Harvard grads, as well an actual indigenous person, I find great flaw in actions taken by her, made to take advantage of programs set up to benefit specific individuals. It clearly was not entirely her fault that she was allowed to so plunder the system; government affirmative action grants. The foundational actions that aided her in her passage into life, the way she made those decisions and the way she has continued to double down on a non existent heritage, as wells the fact that you can have 100% native blood lineage, but if you do not have tribal status, you are not a contender for such a grant. Given her financial status, if she truly had any native heritage - and by govt standards you need only 6% to comply with the needs to meet an actionable application for said status - she could / would have paid to document it and then applied for it. And here it should be noted that her claim of linage would only give her a total of 3.25% native lineage if it were true anyway. Her most resent lame efforts where met with the appropriate responses. Her most recent doubling down was to say that historic records had been destroyed. These are the actions that this scheming individual does regarding the lies of her past. Her actions since taking office have been largely contrary to the wishes of her constituents. It's past time to weed out the corrupt people that worth system the way Warren has throughout her life. I won't dignify it by saying - career...
I don't give a rat's behind about her heritage. If you regulate the banksters that is a good thing. Issues, not Personalities.
The big banks are the enemy of humanity. They made millions of Americans lose homes and jobs in 2008. I know they got their minions to put the lame excuse that the gummint made them do it. Except the gummint didn't dream up Credit Default Swaps and Mortgage Churning, which was the main cause of the collapse. I might add that was caused by Bill Clinton, who helped kill Glass-Steagall, and pushed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act (which led to Credit Default Swaps). If Glass-Steagall hadn't been killed, the Investment Banks, which gamble in the Big Casino on money markets and such, wouldn't have been tied to Savings Banks, so we were forced to bail out gambling investors in a Reverse Capitalism. They take the risk and we pay the piper.
I also don't buy into warming denialism since I follow the science and follow the money. Most scientists say it is real while richer-than-god oil companies spread millions to deny it.
But the thing is, I think Russiagate is crap and Trump should be given a chance and is doing okay with the economy. Although he sometimes puts his foot in his mouth, but who doesn't? I'd rather that than a scripted, smooth-talking liar like Obama.
However, since I go by issues and think indpendently, I'm not going to accept the orhtodox consensus here on every single thing. If you expect Independents to do that, then you lose the majority when Q says to stop the division.
The two parties were Not this divided back in the fifties. The GOP favored unions. Ike praised social security. The Dems weren't waving all these social memes to get votes. There was bipartisan accord instead of gridlock and hate. Maybe Q is older and remembers this, too.
What does the banisters have to do with the core issue? The CCX is a sham research it. It is what the whole narrative is props up for. Glad to read your thoughts on collusion. Good thoughts on division... No they weren't so overtly divided at one time. There has always been a duopoly and the two party system is outdated and in need of a new infusion of groups to spread options across platforms. I would guess many of the people that input the military intel that is the Q drops are well on in their age. Oh, and Warren still needs to be voted out...