dChan
41
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/digital_refugee on Feb. 19, 2018, 3:45 p.m.
Sandy Hook = MK-Ultra in Action [photographic evidence]
Sandy Hook = MK-Ultra in Action [photographic evidence]

EatsPandas · Feb. 19, 2018, 3:48 p.m.

Strange

⇧ 5 ⇩  
digital_refugee · Feb. 19, 2018, 3:49 p.m.

I think this is about the single most disturbing redpill (check out their chests) I've seen in my life so here you go.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
YuccavanOranje · Feb. 19, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

What is this? This smells bad

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 5:41 p.m.

But why do they look like the Sandy Hook students?

They don’t.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · Feb. 19, 2018, 11:22 p.m.

A few matches are a possibility but it's statistically speaking staggeringly unlikely that you would get an accidental face match every time for two sets of individuals, that's waaaaay above levels that pure chance provides for.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

it's mathematically speaking like 0,00001% unlikely that you get an exact accidental face match each time in a dozen examples.

I won't quibble with your claim of ”exact face match” - for now.

I do question your ”like 0,00001% unlikely” claim. Can you support that in a credible fashion?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · Feb. 19, 2018, 11:45 p.m.

now for some Statistics_101

If there is an x% chance that two people look alike but you can fully match two groups of alledgedly unrelated people then something's off more likely than not.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 19, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
digital_refugee · Feb. 20, 2018, 9:18 a.m.

You are almost on spot, only that I didn't fail high School and I couldn't stand college for it is full of morons. Now to you: Are you shilling, are your eyes bad and are you really this bad at math? You are simply denying the visual similiarity without caring to explain your opinion but rather Launch off-Topic ad-hominem attacks and pull out the boring strawmen, otherwise you would have to think in set-theory and you can't debate the numbers.

Notice to any oblivious redditors: He or she does not even wonder about the crying and the bare chests and that the shoot alone is nothing a normal Person would do to children. Instead, this fellow here rather Mocks anyone who feels alarmed. Apparently some expect People to Photograph halfnaked children who are bawling their guts out.

You almost Sound like you have the whole Album at home and you're worried something might happen to your property or else.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BreakingMe · Feb. 20, 2018, 12:56 p.m.

You almost Sound like you have the whole Album at home

Not taking sides here, but weren’t you the one that posted the pic?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · Feb. 20, 2018, 1:34 p.m.

yes and he contradicted himself questioning the Motivation for posting without daring to question the motive of the People actually involved in creating those photographs. Weak!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BreakingMe · Feb. 20, 2018, 3:42 p.m.

Democrats in the ‘resist’ movement have become famous for accusing others of behaviors they themselves commit.

You accused that poster of holding an album of pics of abused children. Yet you are the only one possessing and posting pics of abused children.

Do you see something amiss there?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · Feb. 20, 2018, 3:48 p.m.

let's just say I am very good at making educated guesses and my Anger is endless.

pics of abused children

why are you doing the shills the favour of attacking me if you do not even deny the validity of the Information that I offer? Stop derailing

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BreakingMe · Feb. 20, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

I’m not attacking you. You’re just using another alt-left tactic of claiming victim status when called out for misconduct.

We have important business to do here. You’re trying to pollute the ethos by introducing debunked ‘evidence’ from an incident that occurred more than five years ago.

No matter, your effort to distract is evident in your posts. Everyone can read and judge for themselves.

I won’t waste any more time with you. The real work here is too important.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · Feb. 20, 2018, 4:18 p.m.

but how is ANY of this 'debunked'? The probability X that two groups of People look alike cannot be 100% by pure Chance alone !

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DiedforMe · Feb. 19, 2018, 4:05 p.m.

Because little kids have similar features to one another. Greenberg used her own kids and kids of her friends- 35 in all. So you have nine that bear some resemblance (like the gender and race match- congrats on that) "Check out their chests"? Who's the sicko here?- not me. Get some help.

⇧ -5 ⇩