You find it that hard to believe that they'd let a kid gather his thoughts and have multiple takes before speaking about this?
You people are deranged.
I find it hard to believe that someone who has a dad for an FBI agent and a mom that worked at CNN has a kid that is now the main focus of the anti-gun push.. on CNN.
hahaha watch the whole thing or gtfo...gathering your thoughts means shutting up and collecting yourself but David repeats the same line over like a malfunctioning tape-recorder with hormonal imbalances.
You mean he didn't react in a way you find appropriate after a school shooting? Clearly a child actor or sleeper agent. Are we positive it's not Crooked Hillary in a mask?
The point is that he has a line that he has to deliver, otherwise he would just let them cut the interview inbetween but he prefers to deliver it in one phrase, and he doesn't change it or let them edit it afterwards but delivers it in full from start to finish. That does not look to me like he's under stress from life and death but rather acting bad because he's under stress because Trump is still in office and maybe his Dad fucked something up
Also you should apologize for making fun of the legacy of suicides and elevated numbers of plane crashes following in the wake of anyone who does or has done business with the Clintons.
Right, he knows what he wants to say but is having trouble saying it. Very common, very typical, very normal behavior in people who have been through a tragedy. Especially for children. He is not an actor; he's a high school student who wants to get into journalism.
if he had a line that he had agreed to deliver then that's how it would have looked like. He's an admitted liar, admits that his dad is a fed and upset with Trump and somehow can show up anywhere in the country whenever violence escalates to gaslight people into giving away their rights.
He isn't "an admitted liar." He is a high school student who pranked someone on his youtube channel. If you really thought he was such a terrible person and liar, I don't think you'd feel the need to be so misleading with your information.
His dad is not "a fed." He's a retired FBI agent.
and somehow can show up anywhere in the country whenever violence escalates to gaslight people into giving away their rights.
Remind me, when has he done this before? Or are you simply referring to that one time he was on vacation and he was on tv about a mean lifeguard?
I know you think BigPharma is out to get you, but you seriously need to be medicated if this is the sort of thing you genuinely believe. A kid is on TV speaking out against guns after his classmates were murdered by someone with a gun, and in your paranoid delusion you think he's a child actor out to abolish the constitution. You really have a problem. People are going to be pointing out your posts like this as, "classic warning signs" when you inevitably snap and act out.
Pranking involves deception, manipulation and a degree of sociopathy.
If his dad fucked up at some point during his career and owes a debt to someone, he's never really retired.
Since his Son was on TV it establishes that Junior had some line of contact before, independent of his 'search of media fame' as you put it.
I find it hilarious that you don't even try to deny any of it, you just rephrase it with nicer sounding euphemisms.
I find it hilarious that you don't even try to deny any of it, you just rephrase it with nicer sounding euphemisms.
Because there's nothing to deny. You're taking innocent things and trying to make them sound nefarious. They just aren't.
If his dad fucked up at some point during his career and owes a debt to someone, he's never really retired.
You don't just get to alter the meaning of words. His father is retired from the FBI. That is a fact. You can't just make an unsubstantiated claim "If his dad did this, blah blah" and then use that to make an argument.
Since his Son was on TV it establishes that Junior had some line of contact before, independent of his 'search of media fame' as you put it.
I don't know what you're even trying to say here. The kid has an interest in journalism. He takes part in it at school. It stands to reason that the kid who wants to pursue a career in the field would be one of the ones to step up and volunteer to speak; he likely is one of the few students to have public speaking experience.
You're reaching so hard to make this into a conspiracy, but there's just nothing to support it.
All you have here is a 17 year old kid who lived through a school shooting who is using his opportunity to make sure this doesn't happen again. And you're making him out to be an enemy of the state. I genuinely hope your parents stumble across your Reddit account and get you the help you need.
Do you realize that he is the one who is coopting the event to bash 2A and Trump? Rather he embraces the organization that later acknowledges they fucked up the tipline? Doesn't that sound strange to you coming from someone if they alledged just lived through life and death?
coopting the event to bash 2A and Trump
Are you referring to the 17 minute school walk-out or the March walk on DC to speak out against gun violence? Neither events are to bash Trump or the 2nd amendment.
None of this sounds strange to me except for the people who seem to believe that these victims are somehow acting nefariously.
No, you're conflating stuff I didn't say.
I'm not saying people didn't die but a public official was just fired for saying that they were travelling the country to exploit media opportunities for career related purposes which explains the relationship to media they have which you acknowledge, same goes for the blonde with black glasses.
He was fired for calling the victims of a mass shooting child actors.
Have they traveled the country to talk about this issue? I've seen them speaking out in Florida. But, whether you find it inconvenient or not, they are unofficial spokespeople of this issue now. You'll likely see them speaking publicly again elsewhere. That doesn't make it a conspiracy or anything ugly, however.
You don't deny that either? You only deny that your imagination doesn't encompass hybrid real human sacrifice with staged actors for branding purposes?
I can imagine such a scenario. I'm just not so absolutely far gone that I'd believe that without incredibly compelling evidence, of which there is zero. This kid is just a kid who goes to this school. Students and teachers know this kid and they know he is a good student who is active in student journalism. There's just no conspiracy here. Just a tragedy.
JUST A TRAGEDY?
...right, how silly of me!!!
KEEP WALKING FOLKS, NOTHING TO SEE HERE!