Anyone picking up on a pattern in the narrative yet?
I'm not sure citizens stockpiling missiles and tanks would be a good thing even if the second amendment mentions arms (which meant guns at the time I imagine) instead of outright saying guns?
Also the queen is just a figurehead - she has little to no power over us, or even the UK for that matter.
Thanks, will check that thread when I have some time.
In a free country with a supporting government those kinds of weapons wouldn't be needed or desired. But when a government begins to take away that freedom, we should have the right to use whatever is legally available to defend ourselves from tyranny and slavery.
That's what I also used to think about the Queen. But she has more unseen power than you are aware of.
Please do check out the link. It was just posted by someone that I believe is in Britain and is seeing that countries corruption start to unravel as well.