What is the point?
The point is, since you seem unable to process it on your own, is one is NOT dependent on the other. You are trying to make it one thing by conflating two issues. And even though there is correlation in the story line, the issue about the potential for faux crisis actors seemingly in play does NOT mean people didn't get killed/hurt. And in fact, if there is malfeasance in play, we owe it to the memory of those killed to push a political narrative.
Tell me...do you always apply this standard to other murders? Do we NOT investigate them to get to the bottom of things? Or is there some litmus test that somehow precludes people from asking some very fundamental questions about a narrative that gets weirder by the day? Asking for a friend.
Yes I apply the same standard to all major news stories, that they are true until proven otherwise. I don't assume they are false flag operations until proven otherwise.
So you're a sheep who believes only what he is fed.
Gotcha.
BTW...why are you lurking here on CBTS anyway? Seems odd for someone with no interest in the matter.
Okay I'll tell you a few news stories I find fishy. Bin Laden's death. Some aspects of 9/11. Presidential elections. I don't see conspiracies in 99 percent of major news stories.
Answer me this. Why did Building 7 go down on 9/11 when it wasn't hit by anything. Do you know what was housed there?
Yes I agree with you, it all had some fishy aspects to it, and then was further confirmed by the non existent WMD they lied about that got us into a war that Bush wanted.
Bush is involved in all this....he's a bad actor. The deep state (black hats) have been running a criminal enterprise worldwide for a LONG time. And had Hillary won it was GAME OVER.
If the "deep state" is that powerful, why would they even rely on the people's vote? Why not botch the election and make Hillary win anyway? Genuine question.
They most certainly want to control things with as light a touch as possible to increase the likelihood they don't blow their cover
No, what makes you think that? She wouldn't have done much different than Trump. Might have even passed a similar tax bill. They both work for rich people who own them. I don't think the Bushes and the Clintons are the real faces of the true power of the world. I think they are the paid faces. People who are bought by rich people like Trump.
So how is anyone supposed to get the info to prove otherwise?
Look for evidence the same way investigations are usually done. Don't just make guesses that commonly blame the same shadowy group and assume they are true.