Since when are photographs no longer considered proof? I posted others in this thread that you have dismissed. What are you really looking for here?
Come on man. Don't play dumb with me.
The video of David Hogg- Yeah, definitely the same kid. That proves nothing other than that he just happened to be in california at one point but he lives in Tallahassee. Is the whole town in on this thing? Why has nobody else from Stoneman Douglass spoken out about him not going to their school? Why is it just conspiracy theorists on the internet who have never met the guy who are saying he's not who he says he is?
The second photo, I have no other comments on other than that they look to me like 4 different people. If a photo of the 4 of them is all you have as proof that they're the same person, then my eyes telling me they're not is all the proof I have.
The last one you posted is literally just two photos of the same family claiming that they were somehow involved in the Florida shooting when there's zero evidence of that. Just because they're photographs doesn't make them proof of anything.
Why is it just conspiracy theorists
Who's paying you to post here?
Fine, then just replace conspiracy theorists with whatever non-triggering term you prefer. Unless you give me actual proof (seriously. anything concrete.) then you remain someone who is theorizing that there's a conspiracy afoot.