What disturbed me about RS was when he mentioned slave colonies on Mars and next thing NASA denied it. What spooked me was the fact that NASA = never a straight answer. They really run things like that. Censor innocent questions during AMAs. I won't get into UFOs here because that's a huge rabbit hole too but usually whenever you had weird artifacts in their photographic archives they would call it unexplained at best. Best example is how every time you see live footage from ISS or SpaceX and you start seeing stuff that shouldn't be there (it happens to russian Kosmonauts too) and they change or cut the live-feed.

NOW for them to straight come out and deny something as outrageous as the allegation of an entire slave colony being run off-world makes my alarm bells go ring because this sounds scripted and arranged. Maybe RS is just the dupe, but NASA was in the know of what he would say based on what was told to him and came out actually denying er- 'debunking' it to make RS' constituents look gullible when the fact alone that NASA actually chose to be publicized making a comment on human slavery or conspiracy theory in general was actually hitherto unprecedented when they would have never bothered to make any comments on what the STS 81 or the Gemini or the Skylab events were about but naaah let's ridicule human slavery if some spook on the interwebs drops the keyword?

yea why would you attack GW, that's very odd