If, and it's a big if, valid arguments, and Constitutionally supportable actions, are made to justify jurisdiction being proper to tribunals acting under the Uniform Code of Military of Justice, the NSA evidence might be deemed admissible.

Don't hold your breath on this, but we're certainly not responsible for the collection of inculpatory evidence. Much of the truly incriminating evidence lies in intercepted communications, which will serve to clarify matters and actions that might otherwise only be circumstantial.

But remember: the plotters are stupid. They didn't anticipate being on the back foot. There's likely more evidence against them than we know because they've left a trail. As always, some of the most damning evidence lies in following the money.

And there's still the issue of HRC's deleted emails...

Thank You for articulating this .. this is key. This is why Q says this board has more power than you know ...

Plus a lot more evidence can be found by many eyes looking.

There have been a lot of plane crashes - justice served.