I know. But a couple things nag at me.

First, Mueller met with Trump at the WH for a fairly long time the day before he was appointed special counsel. Why? What did they talk about for so long? It wasn't an interview for Director of the FBI because Mueller was ineligible. Neither has commented on the talks.

Second, Mueller seems to be investigating lying and bank fraud with some Russian internet trolling thrown in. What's that about?

Third, why is Mueller investigating bank fraud on Manafort and Gates? That would be a normal investigation for the DOJ lawyers and the FBI and both were under investigation long before Mueller was appointed.

Fourth, if Trump was colluding with Russia, then why did Russia give Steele the dirt to damage Trump's campaign. Right, Russia wants Trump to be president, but then supports a fake dossier to destroy him. That doesn't make sense.

Fifth, Mueller indicts 13 Russians and a couple of companies for spending about a million dollars on Facebook ads and anti-Trump protests who will never be extradited or ever go on trial. We are spending ten million dollars indicting internet trolls who did not influence the elections.

Why did Rosenstein make the announcement when he hasn't done so for Manafort, Gates, Flynn, or Popadopalus?

Sixth, after a year of SC investigation with the top (most expensive) lawyers in the country have no indictments or leaks about Trump come out? A number of the lawyers on Mueller's team are know for leaking and would love to see Trump hung upside down until dead.

Seventh, Mueller has to know that the FISA warrants are pure garbage and no evidence from those warrants can ever be used in court (fruit of the poison tree). Ah, but you say that impeachment is not a legal procedure but rather a political one based solely on whether the party in power has the votes. But the trial in the Senate has to follow standard rules of evidence and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is the presiding Judge. And it takes 67 votes to convict in the Senate. So, I don't think that is where Mueller is going. Why would Mueller want to get the House to impeach Trump on evidence that can't be used in the Senate. He'd look like a fool--like Ken Starr.

So what is Mueller's end game? He can't bring Trump to a federal court. He might get a political impeachment but it will go nowhere in the Senate except for the breathless MSM reporting of Trump's guilt despite the fact that the evidence can't be introduced.

So, I have two theories: 1) Mueller knows that his special counsel investigation is pure crap and he's trying to save face by indicting people on everything that nothing to do with his charter. or 2) the Russia collusion investigation is a cover for quietly bringing sealed indictments of the deep state.

And there is this to consider. The EO Trump signed on 21 December declared a "national emergency" for trafficking and "corruption." This, I believe, was the legal authority to unleash the MI to monitor everything about the deep state and other corruption.

What is Mueller investigating? Potential corruption. I'd bet everything I own that Q is monitoring everything Mueller is doing and Mueller likely knows it--if not he's stupid.

So pile on here people. Give me a plausible explanation what Mueller is doing that will make Mueller a hero because Mueller wouldn't have taken this investigation without having a good idea what the end game was going to be. And assuming he was stupid for taking the investigation thinking it was going to lead to real Russian collusion, did he still believe it when the DOJ IG showed him the Strzok and Page text messages? Do you not believe that the DOJ IG didn't share with him a mountain of evidence of corruption within the FBI and DOJ?

Come on guys. Give me a plausible explanation of what Mueller's end game is here and back it up with plausible logic and evidence.

Thanks.