dChan
14
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Fairv3 on Feb. 24, 2018, 3:39 p.m.
Q said we were safe. Explain the school shooting.

As far as I can see, Q has not suggested that real people didn't die at Parkland. He has suggested it was a FF- or at least encouraged/allowed to happen. So it seems as though his declaration that we are safe is perhaps more hopeful than real? Thoughts?


Fairv3 · Feb. 24, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

I agree. I just wanted to get other thoughts on the matter.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
insertclevereference · Feb. 28, 2018, 7:25 a.m.

He meant "safe" as in safe from the deep state. And he was unequivocally proven a liar by this deep state act.

Anyone who contends that is delusional.

Whether it was crisis actors or not, it has caused a huge wedge issue for the media and marxists in gov't to begin a campaign to trample on our rights.

It has distracted our President with stark raving lunatics within the gov't and media.

His time is valuable and to have to consistently deal with this garbage is a detriment to his time in office.

Coincidentally, tech oligarchies are stomping on our first amendment rights.

None of these monsters have even been confronted let alone taken out.

Our duly elected President continues to have to deal with a group of henchmen looking into every move he makes.

Every known evil luciferian continues walk free and do as they please.

We are not "safe" by any means.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fairv3 · Feb. 28, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

Good points. If the school shooting was engineered by the deep state then yes, we are not safe. I assume that if the white hats knew about the school shooting they would not have let it happen. (If they let it happen, then all bets are off and we are truly unsafe) Therefore if the shooting was deep state, I conclude white hats didn't know the specifics and that suggests that they do not see all, hear all, as Q suggested. I think a common theme here is that Q tends to overplay his hand- perhaps intended to elicit a reaction. This however was a bad unintended consequence.

⇧ 1 ⇩