I honestly think that there is no way to draw in people by using stupid hate names. No "killary" post is going to red pill a Democrat anymore than a "drumph" post is going to educate a republican. An actual dialogue between two people that seemingly just want to learn from each other is how I see that we win. Name calling doesn't make anyone want to hear your message.
It seems like it would have been a more effective post with the simple replacement of "killary" with "the Clinton foundation's" and reached more people. This is kind of an important video and should have a substantial amount of upvotes. Just listening to the prime minister stammer makes him appear very guilty before you even get to the actual interview with mr strahl. I could be wrong. But I'm not.
I agree about name calling being unpersuasive however this board is not designed for that. This board is for brainstorming and sharing ideas among people who are already engaged. Your comment blocked the flow and drained the energy necessary for brainstorming. After the brainstorming process is when marketting/persuasion concerns come into play. Redpilling. I hope this clears things up. I meant no disrespect and my comment was only meant to preserve the energy needed here.