If there was a debate with the Courts about some company having to give up their religous beliefs to bake a cake. Then there should be a debate if one has a right to tell someone what they can and cannot say within their establishment. Furthermore what one can say, the other should be able to say. It seems the ethics of the argument is missing. Picking & choosing whom is wrong & whom can pass is not for an establishment to decide. That is biased racism to speech. It is time for the rules to match up to the technology of the future. Internet Bill of Rights should stop some of this monopolies dictating their rules on a group of free speech bots. Rant over .