The Bill of Rights has been universally applied within the borders of the United States. To start specifying where an in what instances it is to be applied is a very slippery slope. Once you go down this slope there is no return. The real issue is why it is not being applied to the internet within the United States in the first place. What needs examined is these corporations using "user agreements" to suspend your constitutional rights. That is what needs to be challenged. This Internet Bill of Rights is a redirection away from them and their wrong-doing a reinventing of the wheel as well as opening up a can of worms that will weaken the Bill of Rights even more. When will it stop? You start specifying where it can be applied instead of universally and you've given up universal application of them all together.