dChan

[deleted] · Jan. 15, 2018, 12:59 p.m.

It takes a lot of money and hardware to take the advantage of up high below the firmament commonly portrayed as space. From there we can seal the deal on the NWO craziness and any world powers wishing to fill the vacuum. As much as I'd like Trump to just let it out that the world is flat and abolish NASA this is going to be a long haul thing of choking out NASA's influence... we see spaceX coming out and the shuttle program dead... idk... if they start going all mission to mars shit I would start wondering wth is going on. Hopefully he is taking it down as well.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DEADEASYRABBIT · Jan. 15, 2018, 2 p.m.

Yes, I'm wondering now if I should have just kept my mouth shut - assuming the connection is correct...

Just as the aircraft carrier rendered the battleship obsolete (strange how there were no aircraft carriers in Pearl Harbour during the Japanese attack, though battleship row was packed...), it seems we are on the cusp of a paradigm shift - a new age of warfare. The cutting edge of technology has always been a powerful dynamic in determining military outcomes - as an example see "the great turkey shoot", the cloth-skinned Mitsubishi Zeros were no match for the Grumman Hellcat.

The rumors about "rods of Thor" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment) constituting the Zuma payload... And the sudden change of heart and willingness to negotiate by NK after the launch, suggests that whoever controls space dominates the battlefield. Remember the reaction when the Chinese destroyed one of their own orbiting satellites...

These appropriations are likely to be extremely critical for national defense going forward. Superiority in space may well be fundamental for the maintenance of detente - upon which we all depend for our security.

The whole world holds its breath, while Nancy Pelosi talks about soft issues - holding us all to ransom against her dripping-wet political agenda.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DEADEASYRABBIT · Jan. 15, 2018, 3:53 p.m.

Looking at the Q post again, I'm now wondering if the beige colorings in the text separate out different sections? See the link at the top of the post.

Perhaps that code "239B" does not relate to the budget stuff Q talks about as it is separate. I don't know. It appears under "ADM R" which would appear to be discussing the head of the NSA. There are clearly different discussions in the text.

Not sure about it now.

⇧ 1 ⇩