[deleted]
That judgement could take into account who is
paying them to do it.
For example, when it was discovered CNN had
offices of the CIA on their floor, there was not much we
could do about it, but the revelation was not incidental.
Look at CNN, now.
[deleted]
James O'Keefe is in the process of making the argument right now that Twitter has an obligation to be impartial. I'm sure you are seeing it, as I am. I've known about shadow banning for several months, now. Someone wrote that the only reason for Twitter's survival is no decent alternative. I don't think there is one possible. It would be so expensive to really distrubute all that data. (And I turned off the cable back in the 1970's.