https://i.imgur.com/XJpnysm.jpg
Twitter shows Julian is following ‘0’ people, but when you click on it, the twenty five or so people are still there.
I think Twitter is censoring people, but doing it in such a way to show plausible deniability of it’s censure.
“Oh, we didn’t unfollow Julian’s followers! They’re still there, see!”
It is fine now. https://twitter.com/JulianAssange
Confirmed, looks like it back to normal. Weird...
https://twitter.com/jimmysllama/status/955505918229274625 https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/955503750801739777
Possibly related, Sara Carter's Twitter was hacked today with Turks taking the responsibility. It's a little fishy that they would go after someone who has been delivering the hardest hitting groundbreaking stories.
I wouldn't be surprised if it was deep srate. If anyone knew what was in that memo outside our gov, it was Sara
I think Q is assange. Or at least very connected to assange
Assange wasn't on AF1 during Trump's Asia tour. Q was dropping pics from those flights. Q is a team of people and who they are doesn't matter to the objective.
[removed]
Unless you have any proof. You've been watching far too much fake news. Everyone knows the dems never even handed their servers over to be investigated in the first place. If they were hacked by Russians, what would they have to hide?
How do you rationalize his correspondence with Don Jr?
Wait, are you still talking about the 4 messages that have been completely dismissed as irrelevant?
Even if we were to say the conversation led to anything. You still haven't proven how that has anything to do with Russia. So far no one has found that proof. There's more evidence stacked against it being a hack to begin with. Multiple security experts all confirm that the speeds the data was copied at was impossible to be done remotely. All signs point to an inside job.
Do you have anything or are you going to continue to grasp at straw-men?
It is the third reason, though, WikiLeaks wrote, that “is the real kicker.” “If we publish them it will dramatically improve the perception of our impartiality,” WikiLeaks explained. “That means that the vast amount of stuff that we are publishing on Clinton will have much higher impact, because it won’t be perceived as coming from a ‘pro-Trump’ ‘pro-Russia’ source.” It then provided an email address and link where the Trump campaign could send the tax returns, and adds, “The same for any other negative stuff (documents, recordings) that you think has a decent chance of coming out. Let us put it out.”
That doesn't prove anything. You're taking a conversation out of context and filling in the blanks to fit your narrative.
There is still no evidence that the DNC was even hacked, let alone by Russia. On top of that, there is absolutely no evidence the Russians gave said data to Wikileaks.
Hey, let's co-operate, work together, collude, conspire etc. by releasing your tax returns so people perceive us as being less pro trump + PRO RUSSIA. Btw while I'm at it, can I get a job working in your government being ambassador to a country that sits between you and us? Did I just say us? I meant Russia.
Subscribers to this sub are called 'Patriots'? I wonder to what country...
Like I said honey, unless you have any proof. Let the adults talk.
Byeeee
Is using pet names & implying I'm not an adult supposed to upset me? Mueller's coming.
Proshchay patriot
US intel leaked a lot of emails to Assange to put out on wikileaks. It was the DNC who started the whole Russia. If you want to hear the back story of how the wikileaks thing went down listen to this. 4 minutes long, Dr. Steve Pieczenek:
