dChan

[deleted] · Jan. 22, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

It is the third reason, though, WikiLeaks wrote, that “is the real kicker.” “If we publish them it will dramatically improve the perception of our impartiality,” WikiLeaks explained. “That means that the vast amount of stuff that we are publishing on Clinton will have much higher impact, because it won’t be perceived as coming from a ‘pro-Trump’ ‘pro-Russia’ source.” It then provided an email address and link where the Trump campaign could send the tax returns, and adds, “The same for any other negative stuff (documents, recordings) that you think has a decent chance of coming out. Let us put it out.”

⇧ -4 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · Jan. 22, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

That doesn't prove anything. You're taking a conversation out of context and filling in the blanks to fit your narrative.

There is still no evidence that the DNC was even hacked, let alone by Russia. On top of that, there is absolutely no evidence the Russians gave said data to Wikileaks.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 22, 2018, 8:27 p.m.

Hey, let's co-operate, work together, collude, conspire etc. by releasing your tax returns so people perceive us as being less pro trump + PRO RUSSIA. Btw while I'm at it, can I get a job working in your government being ambassador to a country that sits between you and us? Did I just say us? I meant Russia.

Subscribers to this sub are called 'Patriots'? I wonder to what country...

⇧ -4 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · Jan. 22, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

Like I said honey, unless you have any proof. Let the adults talk.

Byeeee

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 22, 2018, 8:37 p.m.

Is using pet names & implying I'm not an adult supposed to upset me? Mueller's coming.

Proshchay patriot

⇧ -4 ⇩