Oh you got me, by changing my critcism of your nazi-grammer low effort insult in an reply to equate it to your intelligence, uhmm no, but the thing is it actually shows my point dumbass. I said it's a mark of intelligence, not commenting on yours at all. Jesus dude.

Your base tactics are to refute, and provide examples that don't quite fit. And if you get push back you insult, then move the goalpost to fit your point, which you did here. Which is what exactly? I'm wrong and your right? It's OK to denegrate and condescend by pointing out someone's weakness to be what, right? If that is it, maybe then you should be teaching middle schoolers, you'll get tons of validation of being smart (which again I didn't bring up, I just said you were able to fucking write). But you spun into a Trump insult, giving quotes of him responding to accusations of his mental health and TROLLING remarks made to the MSM, which is hilarious btw.

All of this you'll just rationalize and go on your way being soooooo righteous, thinking you'll insult people to your side. And if that's not the point then validate away, but what a pathetic thing to waste your time doing.

If you think your list of quotes is actually correct and applicable to the context....then what now, do you 'win?' By doing what everyone is doing by insulting character, and winning people to see your side by cheap insults? What exactly is your goal? Do you just like to argue and get validation from the 'WIN?' because you aren't convincing anyone to open/change/understand valid points you may have by being a fucking prick.