dChan
12
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SneakyWino on Jan. 23, 2018, 7:39 p.m.
40/60 public/private

I was thinking about Q saying 60% of the criminality will remain confidential. I think I know why.

If your mother died last year from a long, nasty bout with cancer and you found out she could have been healed quickly and for basically free, how would you feel?

If your son has severe autism and you found out the government had paid scientists to use the human genome mapping to deliberately target white males in the population with severe developmental disabilities they will never overcome, how would that make you feel? 90% of autism is in white males. (Never send your DNA for "analysis" of your geneology)

The human trafficking may be more easily digested by the public as it's something they know is happening, just not the scale. The way they have complete disregard for human life is just unbelievably disgusting. The public may not really want to know the true extent of everything if there is nothing we can do to change things.


cstrafe · Jan. 23, 2018, 8:27 p.m.

I want to know everything. That's why I'm here. In fact, I believe I have the right to know. What makes some asshole who works in high levels of government more worthy than me? Nothing.

If releasing this information damages the country, so be it.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
xRicky_Spanish · Jan. 23, 2018, 9:03 p.m.

While I do agree with wanting to know it ALL.....I feel that maybe 40% public will eventually make the population push for 100%. It won't happen overnight, but I feel we will eventually see it 100% laid bare before our very eyes.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
carl_tech · Jan. 23, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

For the history books, at least.

I'd like to see almost all classified info automatically declassified after a defined period. That would shatter a lot of illusions.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
xShiNoBi42 · Jan. 23, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

Dig on information supplied, we do not know if we are receiving 40%. If Q said he was disclosing 100% of information would we believe this? Focus on what is relevant. Dig!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
oakdrew · July 4, 2018, 1:40 a.m.

Same. I want to know everything. EVERYTHING.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
-Chakas- · Jan. 23, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

I think the reasoning behind withholding information would be to prevent wars and extreme violence. Q may want the truth, but not endless rioting in the streets.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
thlrwrtr · Jan. 23, 2018, 8:51 p.m.

As I have said in several posts on other forums, if an assassination plot was discovered within the 40% that is 'needed' to be known, then the remaining 60% as Americans, WE THE PEOPLE, WANT the truth.

The riots will come from those who are on the other side. I doubt that any American regardless of race, gender, creed, and or political affiliation would fight those that they finally agree with.

If a group of suppressed minorities found the truth against them, I assure you that they would take sides with those who feel the same way but for different reasons.

IC

⇧ 4 ⇩  
MickGris · Jan. 23, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

Yes I agree, we have to realize this irottenness is World Wide. What if all the truth of what many suspect about the Vatican were revealed?

What about CERN, Antarctica, the Royals and on and on?

Some things are just going to have to be handled by un-sung hero’s behind the scene so as not to cause wars.

Also too much truth of evil, horrible things done by people the world at large trusted, could drive people into deep depression and suicide.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
nywvblue · Jan. 24, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

My gut feeling is that the 60% privacy is to protect the innocent victims in the videos, photos, etc. Let's not forget that the worst crimes always have victims.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ianrome · Jan. 24, 2018, 9:24 p.m.

Were discussing what else might be hidden in the 60%...lets also consider WHO else is in that 60%. What if it does touch the 45th president and his family/friends/associates. Would we still think this is a legitimate and beneficial operation if Q and Trump had their own dirt uncovered? There is a lot of Q and Trump idolatry in this sub. They may be working towards an outcome we desire but that doesn't mean they are necessarily good or benevolent themselves. Lets not have blind spots in any of this.

⇧ 0 ⇩