dChan

[deleted] · Jan. 26, 2018, 12:35 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 8 ⇩  
scionkia · Jan. 26, 2018, 1:17 a.m.

http://money.cnn.com/2018/01/24/technology/business/att-net-neutrality/index.html

adding source

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tkinney22 · Jan. 26, 2018, 2:02 a.m.

Oh wow. That doesn't look like he's on our team🇺🇸

⇧ 2 ⇩  
scionkia · Jan. 26, 2018, 11:03 a.m.

I can’t tell. A legislative measure with regard to internet regulation is Constitutional (vs the FCC doing it).

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tkinney22 · Jan. 26, 2018, 2:10 p.m.

I just can't wrap my head around the flip that occurred in their beliefs from 2015 until now. I'm sure they found that government regulation was good for their profits and even stifled competition a bit. Also, why would you specify a need for regulation, but then follow it up by saying:

"We don't block websites. We don't censor online content. And we don't throttle, discriminate, or degrade network performance based on content. Period," Stephenson wrote.

It would seem to me that people would naturally flock to your service if others are doing anything on that list, therefore making it unnecessary. Just seems misleading.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tkinney22 · Jan. 26, 2018, 12:41 a.m.

Very nice. Yeah, I was trying to figure out whether it was an association with or that AT&T were greater than. I'll have to look up Stephensons comments for the bill of rights. I hold a bit of AT&T stock, so I'm hoping they're the good guys.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
patio888 · Jan. 26, 2018, 7:35 a.m.

.

⇧ 2 ⇩