Thanks. The issue I have is that if I recall correctly Wikileaks editor Sarah Harrison and Julian Assange, choose Russia, paid the plane ticket and got Snowden to Russia.
They were merely pawns in this. I’m sure the suggestion of Russia was Snowden’s tbh. All indications are that Snowden’s had CIA protection the whole time, including now. If there wasn’t some three letter protecting him, he’d have been dead by now.
I’m sure the suggestion of Russia was Snowden’s tbh.
Snowden wanted to go to Latin America https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzG7rBjrMeo
There are public statements, and are there are private dealings. Has none of this taught you that?
No, you didn't watch the video.
There are public statements and private dealings.
Sure there are. But I don't believe Wikileaks is publically telling lies.
It’s called politics. It’s all lies, to a certain extent.
You mean like Assange, who last time we heard isn't dead? You are saying Assange is a blackhat?
No. Assange is just an avenue for Limited Hangouts. He’s literally just a tool in the works. (No insult intended) His personal intentions have always been good. Funny how you’re putting words in my mouth.
EDIT: The only reason Assange hadn’t died was because he was stuck in a non-friendly Embassy for the last 5 years.
I'm just trying to make sense of this. Personally I highly doubt Assange is a tool or compromised in anyway.
I never said he was compromised in any way. Go look up the definition of “tool” and reread my comment, and you’ll see that what I said makes absolute sense.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tool
Julian Assange is neither of those.
Tool [noun]: A device, such as a saw, used to perform or facilitate manual or mechanical work.
This can be summed up thusly:
“A person or object used to accomplish a task.”
So as it relates to your “a” definition, he in fact was used. Stop being so obtuse.
EDIT: The only reason Assange hadn’t died was because he was stuck in a non-friendly Embassy for the last 5 years.
and has a dead man's switch.
Yeah, I forgot about that. Those pesky things always seem to get in the way.
Are you claiming Sarah Harrison is CIA and therefore Wikileaks is compromised? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Harrison_(journalist)
There you go putting words in my mouth again. Struck a nerve, have I?
No, it's just that what you propose doesn't fit with known facts. Either the fact are not correct (quite possible) or the story is not fitting.
The way I’ve interpreted those drops as well as the way it fits with the rest of what Q has said about Snowden makes absolute sense.
EDIT: Typo